| Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
| | | | | ¨ | Filed by the Registrant [X] | | Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ] | | Check the appropriate box: | | | | | [ ] | Preliminary Proxy Statement | | [ ] | | ¨ | | Confidential, for use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | | | x | [X] | Definitive Proxy Statement | | | | ¨ | [ ] | Definitive Additional Materials | | | | ¨ | [ ] | Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12 |
| Ultralife Corporation | |
Ultralife Corporation
| | (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | | | Not Applicable | | | (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant) |
| | Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | | | | x | [X] | No fee required | | | | ¨ | [ ] | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11 | | | | | | (1) | | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: _____ | | | | | | | | (2) | | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: ______ | | | | | | | | (3) | | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11: ______ | | | | | | | | (4) | | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: ______ | | | | | | | | (5) | | Total fee paid:_______ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ¨ | [ ] | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | | | ¨ | | | | [ ] | Check boxboxes if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identifyidentifies the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | | | | | | | | | (1) | | Amount Previously Paid: | | | | | | | | (2) | | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | | | | | | | | (3) | | Filing Party: | | | | | | | | (4) | | Date Filed: |
| | ULTRALIFE CORPORATION | | 2000 Technology Parkway | | | | | Newark, New York 14513 |
ULTRALIFE CORPORATION
2000 Technology Parkway
Newark, New York 14513
You are cordially invited to attend the 20122014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Ultralife Corporation on Tuesday, June 5, 20123, 2014 at 9:00 A.M. local time at the Crystal City Marriott at Reagan National Airport, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VirginiaVA 22202-3526. This year, we are again providing our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are mailing to many of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a paper copy of our Proxy Statement and our 20112013 Annual Report to Shareholders. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials contains instructions about how to access those documents and vote online. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also contains instructions about how each of our shareholders can also receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, including the Proxy Statement, our 20112013 Annual Report to Shareholders and a form of proxy card or voting instruction card. By taking advantage of this distribution process, we will not only conserve natural resources, but we will also reduce our costs of printing and distributing proxy materials. We look forward to a productive annual meeting. Very truly yours,
Michael D. Popielec President and Chief Executive Officer
| | | | | Very truly yours, | | | 
| | | Michael D. Popielec
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
| | ULTRALIFE CORPORATION | | 2000 Technology Parkway | Newark, New York 14513 | | | NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS | | JUNE 5, 20123, 2014 | |
Notice is hereby given that the 20122014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Ultralife Corporation will be held on Tuesday, June 5, 20123, 2014 at 9:00 A.M. local time at the Crystal City Marriott at Reagan National Airport, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VirginiaVA 22202-3526 for the following purposes: | 1. | 1. | toTo elect eightsix directors for a term of one year and until their successors are duly elected and qualified; |
| 2. | 2. | toTo ratify the selection of BDO USA,Bonadio & Co., LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012;2014; |
| 3. | To approve our new 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and |
| 4. | 3. | toTo transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments thereof. |
Only shareholders of record of our common stock, par value $.10 per share, at the close of business on April 13, 201211, 2014 are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at and attend our Annual Meeting. Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend our Annual Meeting, we hope that you will vote as soon as possible. If you received only a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail, you may vote your shares at the Internet site address listed on your Notice of Internet Availability. You may also request a paper copy of our proxy materials by visiting the Internet site address listed on your Notice of Internet Availability, by calling the toll-free number or by sending an e-mail to the e-mail address listed on your Notice of Internet Availability. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, you may vote your shares by proxy by doing any one of the following: vote at the Internet site address listed on your proxy or voting instruction card; call the toll-free number listed on your proxy or voting instruction card; or sign, date and return in the pre-addressed envelope provided the enclosed proxy or voting instruction card.
By Order of the Board of Directors Bradford T. Whitmore Chair of the Board of Directors Dated: April 21, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title | INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING | | 1 | | Quorum | 2 | | Vote Required | 2 | | Abstentions | 3 | | Broker Voting | 3 | | | By OrderPROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | 4 | | | | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 7 | | General | 7 | | Committees of the Board of Directors | | 7 | | | 
| | | | | Bradford T. Whitmore
Chair of the Board of Directors
|
Dated: April 26, 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| IMPORTANT | | | REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE IN ANY OF THE MANNERS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. WE ALSO ENCOURAGE BENEFICIAL OWNERS TO FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED BY YOUR BROKER REGARDING HOW TO VOTE. YOUR BROKER CANNOT VOTE YOUR SHARES FOR DIRECTOR NOMINEES OR PROPOSALS 3 AND 4 UNLESS YOU PROVIDE YOUR BROKER WITH VOTING INSTRUCTIONS. SEE “BROKER VOTING” FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | 44 | | ULTRALIFE CORPORATION | | 2000 Technology Parkway | | Newark, New York 14513 | | (315) 332-7100 | | | | PROXY STATEMENT | | | ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS | | | JUNE 3, 2014 | | |
IMPORTANT
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE IN ANY OF THE MANNERS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. WE ALSO ENCOURAGE BENEFICIAL OWNERS TO FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED BY YOUR BROKER REGARDING HOW TO VOTE. YOUR BROKER CANNOT VOTE YOUR SHARES FOR DIRECTOR NOMINEES UNLESS YOU PROVIDE YOUR BROKER WITH VOTING INSTRUCTIONS.
ULTRALIFE CORPORATION
2000 Technology Parkway
Newark, New York 14513
(315) 332-7100
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
JUNE 5, 2012
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING We are furnishing this proxy statement to our shareholders in connection with our Board of Directors’ solicitation of proxies for use at our 20122014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which we refer to in this proxy statement as the Meeting, to be held on Tuesday, June 5, 2012,3, 2014, at 9:00 A.M. local time and at any adjournments thereof. The Meeting will be held at the Crystal City Marriott at Reagan National Airport, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VirginiaVA 22202-3526. In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to in this proxy statement as the SEC, instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to each shareholder of record, we are now furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders on the Internet. If you received only a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request a copy. Instead, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will instruct you how to access and review the proxy materials over the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will also instruct you as to how you may submit your proxy over the Internet. If you received only a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you shouldplease follow the instructions for requesting those materials included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is first being sent to our shareholders on or about April 26, 201221, 2014 and our proxy materials are first being made available to our shareholders on or about April 26, 2012.21, 2014. You may vote by proxy or in person at the Meeting. If you received only a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail, you may vote your shares on lineonline by proxy at the Internet site address listed on your Notice of Internet Availability. You may also request a paper copy of our proxy materials by (i) visiting the Internet site address, (ii) calling the toll-free number or (iii) by sending an email to the email address listed on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials, by calling the toll-free number or by sending an e-mail to the e-mail address listed on your Notice of Internet Availability. Materials. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, you may vote your shares by proxy by doing any one of the following: vote at the Internet site address listed on your proxy or voting instruction card; call the toll-free number listed on your proxy or voting instruction card; or mail your signed and dated proxy or voting instruction card to our tabulator in the self-addressed envelope provided. Even if you plan to attend the Meeting in person, we recommend that you vote by proxy prior to the Meeting. You can always change your vote as described below.
When a proxy card is returned properly signed and dated, the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the shareholder’s directions. If the proxy is signed, dated and returned without choices having been specified, the shares will be votedFOR the election of each director-nominee named therein and FOR the other proposalproposals identified therein. You may receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or more than one paper copy of the proxy materials, including multiple paper copies of this proxy statement and multiple proxy or voting instruction cards, depending on how you hold your shares. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, a separate e-mail or a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold your shares. If you are a shareholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you may receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, more than one e-mail or more than one proxy card. To vote all of your shares by proxy, you must vote at the Internet site address listed on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy or voting instruction card; call the toll-free number listed on your proxy or voting instruction card; or sign, date and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive. If for any reason any of the nominees for election as directors become unavailable for election, discretionary authority may be exercised by the proxies to vote for substitute nominees proposed by our Board of Directors. A shareholder has the right to revoke a previously granted proxy at any time before it is voted by filing with our Corporate Secretary a written notice of revocation, or a duly executed later-dated proxy, or by requesting return of the proxy at the Meeting and voting in person.person at the Meeting. We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mails, some of our officers, directors and regular employees, without extra remuneration, may solicit proxies personally or by telephone, email or similar transmission. We have not engaged a proxy solicitation firm, but we may decide to retain the services of a proxy solicitation firm in the future if we believe it is appropriate under the circumstances. WeIn those situations where the beneficial owner of shares is not the record holder, we will reimburse record holders for reasonable expenses in forwarding proxies and proxy soliciting material to the beneficial owners of the shares held by them.shares. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on April 13, 201211, 2014 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting. As of April 13, 2012,11, 2014, there were 17,384,43517,526,229 shares of our common stock, par value $.10 per share, issued and outstanding, each entitled to one vote per share at the Meeting. A majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock, represented in person or by proxy at the Meeting, will constitute a quorum forwith respect to the transactionvoting of all business.proposals submitted to the shareholders, as described in this proxy statement. For purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, shareholders of record who are present at the Meeting in person or by proxy are considered to be present at the Meeting. The table below shows the vote required at the Meeting to approve each of the proposals described in this proxy statement, assuming the presence of a quorum: | | | | Proposal | | Vote Required | | | | | 1. Election of directors | | Plurality of the shares present in person or by proxy at the Meeting and entitled to vote | | | | 2. Ratification of the selection of BDO USA,Bonadio & Co., LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 2014 | | Majority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the Meeting and entitled to vote* | | | | | 3. Approval of a new 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) | | Majority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the Meeting and entitled to vote |
| * | The selection of BDO USA,Bonadio & Co., LLP is being presented to our shareholders for ratification. The Audit and Finance Committee will consider the outcome of this vote when selecting our independent registered public accounting firm for subsequent fiscal years. |
Shares that abstain from voting on one or more proposals to be acted on at the Meeting are considered to be present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum exists. Abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors; however, abstentions will have the effect of voting against the other proposalproposals set forth in this proxy statement, because abstentions are deemed to be present and entitled to vote but do not count toward the affirmative vote required to approve the proposal.
If you own your shares through a broker and do not provide your broker with specific voting instructions, your broker will have the discretion under the rules governing brokers who have record ownership of shares that they hold in street name for their clients to vote your shares on routine matters but not otherwise.As a result of rules applicable The only proposal being submitted to director elections after January 10, 2010,the shareholders which is considered routine and as to which brokers may no longerexercise discretion to vote is ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm. Brokers will not be permitted to vote shares they hold as nominee in their discretion in the election of directors or other non-routine matters.As a result, your broker may exercise discretion to vote your shares only with respect toin approving the ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm, because that is considered a routine matter.LTIP. If you want your broker-owned shares to be counted in the election of directors, and in approving the LTIP, you must provide instructions to your broker on how to vote your shares. A broker non-vote occurs when shares held by a broker are not voted on a non-routine proposal because the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and the broker lacks discretionary authority to vote the shares in the absence of such instructions. Shares subject to broker non-votes are considered to be present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum exists and thus count towards satisfying the quorum requirement but are not counted for purposes of determining the number of shares entitled to vote on non-routine matters. A broker non-vote will have no effect on the election of directors or on the approval of the LTIP since, they arewith respect to non-routine matters, broker non-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of shares entitled to vote.vote on such proposals. Our Board of Directors currently has eightsix directors, allsix of whom have been nominated to serve for an additional one yearone-year term. If elected, each director standing for election shall serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor shall have been elected and qualified. The names of, and certain information with respect to, the persons nominated for election as directors are presented below. | | | | | | | Name | | Age | | | Present Principal Occupation, Employment History and Expertise | | | | Steven M. Anderson | | | 55Steven M. Anderson | 57 | | Brigadier General (Ret.) Anderson has been a director since April 13, 2010. General (Ret.) Anderson is currently Senior Vice President of Relyant, LLC, a service-disabled veteran-owned small business and global provider of solutions to complex projects. Prior to joining Relyant, LLC in February 2011, General (Ret.) Anderson served as Chief Operating Officer for Synovision Solutions LLC, a service-disabled veteran-owned small business specializing in unique applications of emerging technology, many central to innovative energy solutions. General (Ret.) Anderson, a career military officer who retired from active duty in November 2009, served for five years as a general officer in the US Army, including 15 months as the senior US and coalition logistician in Iraq in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. From 2004 to 2006, General (Ret.) Anderson served as the senior US logistician in Korea (Deputy C-4 for the United Nations Command/Combined Forces Command and J4, United States Forces Korea) and spearheaded the development of Camp Humphreys, the combined and US headquarters facility in Central Korea. He served in various command positions including Commander, Division Support Command, 2ndnd Infantry Division, Korea (2000-02), and Commander, 725thth Main Support Battalion, 25thth Infantry Division (Light), Schofield Barracks, Hawaii (1995-97). In his final military assignment, he served for two years on the Army Staff in the Pentagon as the Director, Operations and Logistics Readiness, Office of the Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G4 (logistics). General (Ret.) Anderson is a 1978 graduate of the US Military Academy at West Point and earned a Masters of Science degree in Operations Research and Systems Analysis Engineering at the Naval Postgraduate School in 1987. General (Ret.) Anderson has been nominated for re-election to our Board of Directors because of his familiarity with the US military.military and knowledge of its procurement processes and policies, which is one of our important customer bases. |
| | | | | | | Name
| | Age | | | Present Principal Occupation, Employment History and Expertise
| | | | Patricia C. Barron | | | 69 | | | Ms. Barron has been a director since December 2000 and served as Chair of the Board of Directors from June 2007 to August 2009. Ms. Barron serves as lead director of Quaker Chemical Corporation and lead director of Teleflex Incorporated, and as a director of United Services Automobile Association, an insurance mutual corporation. She also serves on a number of non-profit organizations, with a focus on education and health. Ms. Barron had a 28-year career in business. She was an Associate at McKinsey and Company and then moved to Xerox Corporation where she became a corporate officer and held the positions of Vice President of Business Operation Support, President of Engineering Systems and President of Office Document Products. Most recently, she has been a Clinical Associate Professor at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business of New York University, where she focused on issues of corporate governance and leadership. Ms. Barron has been nominated for re-election to our Board of Directors because of her longstanding business career and expertise in corporate governance. | | | | James A. Croce | | | 49 | | | Mr. Croce has been a director since June 8, 2010. Mr. Croce is currently the Founder and President of Greenlark Energy Partners, LLC, an advanced energy industry advisory firm, serving in that position since 2008. Previously, Mr. Croce was President and Chief Executive Officer of the Nevada Institute for Renewable Energy Commercialization (NIREC), serving in that position from June 2009 to September 2011. Prior to accepting his position at NIREC, from 2008 to 2009, Mr. Croce was President of Lipten Energy Services, an engineering and energy project development firm. From 2003 to 2008, Mr. Croce was President and Chief Executive Officer of NextEnergy, one of the nation’s leading clean energy technology commercialization catalysts. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Croce was Vice President of Business Development at DTE Energy Technologies, a developer of distributed power generation technologies and energy products including fuel cells, internal combustion engines, turbines and energy information systems. From 1998 to 2001, he was Executive Director, Business Marketing and Sales at Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (MichCon), an integrated natural gas transportation and storage business where he was responsible for sales and marketing programs for the company’s commercial and industrial customers. Prior to that, from 1996 to 1998, he was General Manager at MichCon Pipeline Company, where he launched and managed new energy delivery services. Mr. Croce is a venture partner in Huron River Ventures, serves on the investment review board of the Michigan Pre-Seed Capital Fund, and has served on the board of directors of numerous nonprofit agencies. Mr. Croce has been nominated for re-election to our Board of Directors because of his expertise in the renewable and advanced energy industries. |
| | | | | | | Name
| | Age | | | Present Principal Occupation, Employment History and Expertise
| | | | | Michael D. Popielec | | | 50 | | 52 | Mr. Popielec was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director effective December 30, 2010. Mr. Popielec has 2528 years experience in growing domestic and international industrial businesses. Prior to joining us, Mr. Popielec operated his own management consulting business in 2009 to 2010 and was Group President, Applied Technologies in 2008 and 2009 and Group President, Diversified Components from 2005 to 2007 at Carlisle Companies, Inc., a $2.5 billion diversified global manufacturer. Prior to that, from 2003 to 2005, he held various positions, including Chief Operating Officer, Americas, for Danka Business Systems, PLC. From 1985 to 2002, Mr. Popielec held positions of increasing responsibility at General Electric Company, most recently as a GE corporate officer and President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Power Controls, the European arm of GE Industrial Systems. Mr. Popielec has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Michigan State University. Mr. Popielec has been nominated for re-election to our Board of Directors because of his operations expertise and his experience in growing domestic and international industrial businesses. | | | | Thomas L. Saeli | | |
55Name | Age | Present Principal Occupation, Employment History and Expertise | | | | | Thomas L. Saeli | 57 | Mr. Saeli has been a director since March 5, 2010. Since March 2011, Mr. Saeli has served as the Chief Executive Officer and, since October 2011, as a director of JRB Enterprises, Inc., a manufacturer of commercial and industrial roofing systems. Prior to that, Mr. Saeli was a business consultant to international corporate clients on matters involving business development strategies, consolidations, acquisitions and operations. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Noble International, Ltd., an autoautomotive supplier of engineered laser-welded steel blanks and roll-formed products, from March 2006 to April 13, 2009 when he resigned those positions. Noble International, Ltd. filed for voluntary relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Michigan on April 15, 2009. From 1998 through 2006, Mr. Saeli served as Vice President of Corporate Development for Lear Corporation, an automotive supplier of seating, electronics and interior products, where he also served as Vice President of Mergers and Acquisitions. Mr. Saeli also serves on the Boards of Directors of Advance Capital Management, a mutual fund, and The Oakwood Hospital System in Dearborn, Michigan. Mr. Saeli has been nominated for re-election to our Board of Directors because of his familiarity with the auto industry and his manufacturing, corporate development, mergers and acquisitions and finance experience. Mr. Saeli also qualifies as an audit committee financial expert. |
| | | | | | expert under applicable SEC rules. | Name
| | Age | | | Present Principal Occupation, Employment History and Expertise
| | | | | Robert W. Shaw II | | | 55 | | 57 | Mr. Shaw has been a director since June 8, 2010. From 2010 to 2013 Mr. Shaw is currentlywas the President of Hornblower Yachts, Inc., the largest dining and excursion boat operator in the United States, with over 50 vessels serving California and New York with the Hornblower, Alcatraz and Statue Cruises brands. From 2007 to 2010, he was President of R.M. Thornton, Inc., a mechanical contracting company specializing in the Federal government and healthcare markets. Prior to that, from 1995 to 2006, Mr. Shaw was Chief Executive Officer and Managing Partner at Odyssey Cruises/Premier Yachts, Inc., a leading U.S. dining and excursion boat operator, where he successfully led the company through a sale process to private equity firm ICV Capital Partners. From 1989 to 1995, he served in Sodexho, S.A., one of the world’s largest contract services providers, as both President and Chief Executive Officer of Spirit Cruises, Inc., and Division President of The Seiler Corporation. Mr. Shaw served in the US Marine Corps from 1978 to 1982 as an infantry Captain. Mr. Shaw has consulted or served on a number of boards of advisors of various non-public organizations and he has been nominated for re-election to our Board of Directors because of his management expertise and experience as an executive officer. | | | | Ranjit C. Singh | | |
59Name | Age | Present Principal Occupation, Employment History and Expertise | | | | | Ranjit C. Singh | 61 | Mr. Singh has been a director since August 2000, and served as Chair of the Board of Directors from December 2001 to June 2007. Mr. Singh is currently Chief Executive Officer of CSR Consulting Group, which provides business and technology consulting services. He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Aptara, Inc. (formerly known as Tech Books), a content outsourcing services company, from February 2003 until July 2008. From February 2002 to February 2003, Mr. Singh served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Reliacast Inc., a video streaming software and services company. Prior to that, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of ContentGuard, which develops and markets digital property rights software. Before joining ContentGuard earlier in 2000, Mr. Singh worked for Xerox as a corporate Senior Vice President in various assignments related to software businesses. Mr. Singh joined Xerox in 1997, having come frombeen employed by Citibank where he was Vice President of Global Distributed Computing. Prior to that, he was a principal at two start-up companies and also held executive positions at Data General and Digital Equipment Corporation. Since January 2005, Mr. Singh has served on the Board of Directors of Authentidate Holding Corp. Mr. Singh has been nominated for re-election to our Board of Directors because of his experience in the service industry and withas an executive of growing technology-based organizations. |
| | | | | | companies. | Name
| | Age | | | Present Principal Occupation, Employment History and Expertise
| | | | | Bradford T. Whitmore | | | 54 | | 56 | Mr. Whitmore has been a director since June 2007 and Chair of the Board of Directors since March 2010. Since 1985, he has been the Managing Partner of Grace Brothers, Ltd., an investment firm which holds approximately 3% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Mr. Whitmore and Grace Brothers, Ltd. collectively hold slightly less than 30% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Within the past five years, Mr. Whitmore has served as a director of several non-public companies related to ownership of Grace Brothers, Ltd./affiliates investments as well as not-for-profit organizations. Mr. Whitmore has been nominated for re-election to our Board of Directors because of his corporate development expertise. |
Our Board of Directors has approved the above-named nominees for directors. Our Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR all of these nominees. Unless otherwise directed on your proxy, your shares will be voted FOR the above-named nominees for directors.
Pursuant to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the state under which we were organized, and our By-laws, our business, property and affairs are managed by or under the direction of our Board of Directors. Members of our Board of Directors are kept informed of companyCompany business through regular discussions with our President and Chief Executive Officer and other corporate officers,our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, by reviewing materials provided to them by the Company’s management and by participating in meetings of the Board and its committees. Our Board of Directors has determined that all of our directors (other than Michael D. Popielec, who serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer) are “independent” for purposes of theNASDAQ listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market.standards. Our Board of Directors has also determined that the Chair of the Board of Directors should be an independent director. We believe that the segregation of the roles of Board Chair andfrom that of the President and Chief Executive Officer ensures better overall governance of our companyCompany and provides meaningful checks and balances regarding our overall performance. This structure allows our President and Chief Executive Officer to focus on our business while the Board Chair leads our Board of Directors in establishing corporate policy and complying with heightened regulatory scrutiny.enhancing our governance structure and practices. Our Board of Directors has fourthree standing committees: an Audit and Finance Committee, a Corporate Development and Governance Committee and a Compensation and Management Committee, and a Strategy and Corporate Development Committee (formerly the Mergers and Acquisitions Committee).Committee. During 2011,2013, our Board of Directors held seveneight meetings and the committees of our Board of Directors held a total of 26twenty-five meetings. During 2011,2013, Bradford T. Whitmore served as our Board Chair. As Board Chair, Mr. Whitmore served as a non-voting ex-officio member of all of our Board committees. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of: (1) the total number of meetings of the Board; and (2) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he or she served. Our Board of Directors has adopted a charter for each of the fourthree standing committees that addresses the composition and function of each committee and has also adopted Corporate Governance Principles that address the composition and function of the Board of Directors. These charters and Corporate Governance Principles are available on our website athttp://investor.ultralifecorporation.com under the subheading “Corporate Governance.” Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Principles, it is our policy that directors retire from service at the annual meeting following a director’s 70 thth birthday. Our Board of Directors has determined that all of the directors who serve on these committees are “independent” for purposes of theNASDAQ listing standards, of the Nasdaq Stock Market, and that the members of the Audit and Finance Committee are also “independent” for purposes of Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to in this proxy statement as the Exchange Act. Our Board of Directors based these determinations primarily on a review of the responses of the directors to questions regarding employment, compensation history, affiliations and family and other relationships, and on follow-up discussions.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The composition and the functions of our three standing committees of our Board of Directors are set forth below. Our Board of Directors will meet after the Meeting to appoint members of the committees and designate Chairs of those committees from among those individuals elected at the Meeting to serve on our Board of Directors until the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders. Audit and Finance Committee The current members of the Audit and Finance Committee are Thomas L. Saeli (Chair), Patricia C. BarronSteven M. Anderson and Robert W. Shaw II. This committee selects our independent registered public accounting firm, subject to ratification of our full Board of Directors, and has oversight responsibility for reviewing the scope and results of the independent registered public accounting firm’s annual examination of our financial statements and the quality and integrity of those financial statements. Further, the committee reviews the qualifications and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, and meets with our financial management, including our Internal Audit Manager,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the independent registered public accounting firm to review matters relating to internal accounting controls, our accounting practices and procedures and other matters relating to our financial condition. The committee also reviews and monitors areas of financial risk that could have a material impact on our company.Company. The Audit and Finance Committee met teneleven times during 2011. 2013. Our Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Audit and Finance Committee is “financially literate” in accordance with theNASDAQ listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market.standards. In addition, our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Saeli qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.
Corporate Development and Governance Committee The current members of the Corporate Development and Governance Committee are Patricia C. BarronRobert W. Shaw II (Chair), Steven M. Anderson and Thomas L. Saeli.Ranjit C. Singh. This committee works with management to develop corporate strategy and to identify and evaluate acquisition opportunities, reviews the performance and compensation of our directors, makes recommendations to our Board of Directors for membership and committee assignments and for the compensation of our directors, and manages the annual evaluation of the performance of our President and Chief Executive Officer. The Corporate Development and Governance Committee met five times during 2011.2013. The Corporate Development and Governance Committee was formed on June 4, 2013 by merging the pre-existing Strategy and Corporate Development Committee with the Governance Committee. Prior to the merger of committees on June 4, 2013, the Strategy and Corporate Development Committee met one time and the Governance Committee met three times in 2013. The Corporate Development and Governance Committee identifies potential nominees for directors based on its own research for appropriate candidates as well as on recommendations received by directors or from shareholders as described below. On occasion, theThe Corporate Development and Governance Committee willmay retain an executive search firm to assist in the identification of potential director nominees. The committee will also evaluate information provided by the National Association of Corporate Directors about prospective Board candidates. The evaluation process and the factors considered in undertaking that evaluation are set forth under the caption “Shareholder Recommendations for Director Nominations” below. The Corporate Development and Governance Committee also has overall responsibility for assessing and managing our exposure to various risks.risks associated with the conduct of our business. Compensation and Management Committee The current members of the Compensation and Management Committee are Ranjit C. Singh (Chair), Steven M. Anderson and James A. Croce.Thomas L. Saeli. The Compensation and Management Committee has generalultimate responsibility for determining the compensation of officers elected by our Board of Directors, granting stock options and restricted stock awards and otherwise administering our equity compensation plans, and approving and administering any other compensation plans or agreements. The Compensation and Management Committee has the authority to retain outside experts in making compensation determinations. Our Restated 2004proposed 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan as amended, which we refer to in this proxy statement as the Restated LTIP,(LTIP), is administered by the Compensation and Management Committee. The Compensation and Management Committee met five times during 2011.Strategy and Corporate Development Committee
The current members of the Strategy and Corporate Development Committee are Robert W. Shaw II (Chair), James A. Croce and Ranjit C. Singh. The Strategy and Corporate Development Committee is responsible for working with management to develop corporate strategy and for identifying and evaluating acquisition opportunities. The Strategy and Corporate Development Committee met six times during 2011.
2013. Shareholder Recommendations and Standards for Director Nominations As noted above, the Corporate Development and Governance Committee considers and establishes procedures regarding recommendations for nomination to our Board of Directors, including nominations submitted by shareholders. Such recommendations, if any, should be sent to Corporate Secretary, Ultralife Corporation, 2000 Technology Parkway, Newark, New York 14513. Any recommendations submitted to the Corporate Secretary should be in writing and should include any supporting material the shareholder considers appropriate in support of that recommendation, but must include the information that would be required under the rules of the SEC in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such candidate and a signed consent of the candidate to serve as a director, if elected. The Corporate Development and Governance Committee evaluates all potential candidates in the same manner, regardless of the source of the recommendation. Based on the information provided to the Corporate Development and Governance Committee itwith respect to director candidates, the Corporate Development and Governance Committee will make an initial determination whether to conduct a full evaluation of a candidate. The Corporate Development and Governance Committee considers the composition and size of the existing Board of Directors, along with other factors, in making its determination to conduct a full evaluation of a candidate. As part of the full evaluation process, the Corporate Development and Governance Committee may conduct interviews, obtain additional background information and conduct reference checks of candidates. The Corporate Development and Governance Committee may also ask the candidate to meet with management and other members of our Board of Directors. In evaluating a candidate, our Board of Directors, with the assistance of the Corporate Development and Governance Committee, takes into account a variety of factors as described in our Corporate Governance Principles, including the particular experience, attributes and skills that would qualify the candidate to serve as a director. The criteria for selection to our Board of Directors include character and leadership skills,skills; general business acumen and executive experience; and knowledge of strategy, finance and relations between business and government,government; and internal business – all to ensure an active Board of Directors whose members work well together and possess the collective knowledge and expertise required. Our Corporate Development and Governance Committee reviews the qualifications of any candidatedirector candidates with those of its current directors to augment and complement the skill sets of our current Board members. We believe that it is important for our Board of Directors to be comprised of individuals with diverse backgrounds, skills and experiences. Although we do not have a formal diversity policy and identify qualified potential candidates without regard to any particular classification, we believe that the breadth of experience and qualifications of our Board members promotes Board diversity.
Annual Meeting Attendance Our policy is that all of the directors, absent special circumstances, should attend our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. A regular meeting of the Board of Directors is typically scheduled in conjunction with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All directors but one attended last year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Our Corporate Governance Principles require our Board of Directorsindependent directors to meet in executive session regularly by requiring our independent directorsthem to have at least four regularly-scheduled meetings per year without management present. Our Board of Directorsindependent directors met in executive session six times during 2011.2014. In addition, our standing committees meet in executive session on a regular basis.
Communicating with the Board of Directors Shareholders interested in communicating directly with our Board of Directors as a group or individually may do so in writing to our Corporate Secretary, Ultralife Corporation, 2000 Technology Parkway, Newark, New York 14513. The Corporate Secretary will review all such correspondence and forward to our Board of Directors a summary of that correspondence and copies of any correspondence that, in his opinion, deals with the functions of the Board of Directors or that he otherwise determines requires their attention. Directors may at any time review a log of all correspondence received by us that is addressed to members of the Board of Directors and request copies of any such correspondence. Any concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters will be brought to the attention of the Audit and Finance Committee and handled in accordance with the procedures established by the Audit and Finance Committee with respect to such matters.
We have a Code of Ethics applicable to all employees, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer (who is also our Principal Accounting Officer), and to the extent it applies to their activities, all members of our Board of Directors. Our Code of Ethics incorporates the elements of a code of ethics specified in Item 406 of Regulation S-K and also complies with the Nasdaq Stock MarketNASDAQ requirements for a code of conduct. Shareholders can find a link to this Code of Ethics on our website athttp://investor.ultralifecorporation.com under the subheading “Corporate Governance.” We intend to post amendments to or waivers (whether expressedexpress or implied) from the Code of Ethics (to the extent applicable to our Principal Executive Officer or Principal Financial Officer) at the same location on our website as the Code of Ethics. Our Code of Ethics emphasizes our commitment to conducting business in a legal and ethical manner and encourages prompt and confidential reporting of any suspected violations of law or the Code of Ethics. As part of our Code of Ethics, directors and employees are expected to make business decisions and to take actions based upon the best interests of our companyCompany and not based upon personal relationships or benefits. Any potential conflict of interest, and any transaction or relationship involving our officers or directors that could give rise to a conflict of interest, must be reviewed and resolved by our Corporate Development and Governance Committee.
Related Party Transactions We have adopted written policies and procedures for the review and approval or ratification of any “related party transaction,” as defined by us as any transaction, or proposed transaction, in excess of $120,000 between us and any of our executive officers, directors or director nominees.Regulation S-K, Item 404. The policy provides that each related party transaction must be reviewed by our Audit and Finance Committee. The committeeAudit and Finance Committee reviews the relevant facts and circumstances of the transaction, including if the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arms-length dealings with an unrelated third party and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction, taking into account the conflicts of interest and corporate opportunity provisions of our Code of Ethics, and either recommends that the Board of Directors approve or disapprove the related party transaction. We will disclose all required related party transactions, as required, in our filings with the SEC. To our knowledge, no reportable transaction existed during 2011,2013, and there are currently no such proposed transactions.
Our management team is responsible for assessingassisting the Corporate Development and managingGovernance Committee in its assessment of our exposure to various risks.risks associated with the conduct of business. We have an enterprise risk management process to identify, assess and manage the most significant risks facing our company. Our Corporate Development and Governance Committee has generaloverall responsibility to review management’s risk management process, including the policies and guidelines used by management to identify, assess and manage our exposure to risk. Our Audit and Finance Committee has oversight responsibility for financial risks and other risks that could have a material impact on our company.Company. Our management reviews these financial risks with our Audit and Finance Committee regularly and reviews the risk management process, as it affects financial risks, with our Audit and Finance Committee on an on-going basis. Our Compensation and Management Committee evaluates the extent to which our compensation policies expose us to risk that could threaten the value of our company.
In 2011,
all bonus plans were reviewed with Human Resources, Finance and our Chief Executive Officer, and officer bonus plans required Compensation and Management Committee approval;
the metrics of those bonus plans were reviewed to make sure they were financial in nature and were stretch in nature;
all commission plans were developed by the Business Unit Vice Presidents and Human Resources followed by Finance and Chief Executive Officer review;
10 all stock option or equity requests are approved by Human Resources, our Chief Executive Officer and the Business Unit leader followed by Compensation and Management Committee approval and, in the case of awards for more than 10,000 shares, Board of Directors approval;
additional guidelines were adopted so that effective January 1, 2011 the Compensation and Management Committee is notified and in some cases must approve certain compensation actions for key non-officer employees.
The Compensation and Management Committee has reviewed our incentive compensation arrangements to determine whether the risks related to the design and operation of our compensation plans and programs, if present, were reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. We have concluded that such arrangements do not encourage excessive risk taking and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.
We use a combination of cash compensation and stock-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our Board of Directors. Our practice is to resurvey our peer group companies every two to three years to ascertain whether our overall director compensation is appropriate and balanced. If we perceive that there has been a major change in our companyCompany or the market, we may conduct a more frequent survey. In setting director compensation, we consider the amount of time that directors spend fulfilling their duties to us, the skill-level required by members of our Board of Directors, and, based on an independent review by our external compensation consultant and other publicly available director compensation data, the compensation paid to directors in similar sized organizations in our industry. Our program remainsis designed to deliver annual director compensation at approximately the median levels of director compensation for companies in similar industries and of similar size. As our directors are elected annually in June of each year, our annual director compensation period runs from July 1 to June 30.
Director Cash Compensation Each non-employee director receiveswill receive an annual cash retainer of $20,000, except for the Board Chair, who receiveswill receive an annual cash retainer of $24,000 for the period July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014. The annual cash retainers were identical to the year earlier period, except the annual cash retainer for the director compensation period ending June 30, 2013 for the Board Chair was $28,000. In addition, each director who is a member of a Board committee receives an additional cash retainer for such committee service as summarized in the tables below.
For the Period July 1, 20102012 to June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | Annual Retainer for
Committee Members | | | Annual Retainer for
Committee Chair | | Audit and Finance Committee | | $ | 6,750 | | | $ | 16,750 | | Compensation and Management Committee | | $ | 5,250 | | | $ | 13,250 | | Governance Committee | | $ | 4,500 | | | $ | 9,500 | | Strategy and Corporate Development Committee | | $ | 3,750 | | | $ | 8,750 | |
2013 | | | Annual Retainer for Committee Members | | | Annual Retainer for Committee Chair | | | Audit and Finance Committee | | | $6,750 | | | | $16,750 | | | Compensation and Management Committee | | | $5,250 | | | | $13,250 | | | Governance Committee | | | $4,500 | | | | $9,500 | | | Strategy and Corporate Development Committee | | | $5,250 | | | | $13,250 | |
For the Period July 1, 20112013 to June 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | Annual Retainer for
Committee Members | | | Annual Retainer for
Committee Chair | | Audit and Finance Committee | | $ | 6,750 | | | $ | 16,750 | | Compensation and Management Committee | | $ | 5,250 | | | $ | 13,250 | | Governance Committee | | $ | 4,500 | | | $ | 9,500 | | Strategy and Corporate Development Committee | | $ | 4,500 | | | $ | 9,500 | |
2014
| | | Annual Retainer for Committee Members | | | Annual Retainer for Committee Chair | | | Audit and Finance Committee | | | $6,750 | | | | $16,750 | | | Compensation and Management Committee | | | $5,250 | | | | $13,250 | | | Corporate Development and Governance Committee | | | $6,750 | | | | $16,750 | |
Annual retainers for both committee members and committee chairs are paid quarterly in cash. For Board and committee service during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011,2013, we paid our directors an aggregate $237,890.$230,268. In addition, as described below, the Compensation and Management Committee approved that in lieu of quarterly stock payments due directors on February 15, 2013 and May 15, 2013, we would pay our directors in cash rather than in shares of our common stock. For each director other than the Board Chair, this would mean an additional $20,000 of cash compensation in lieu of shares of common stock valued at $20,000, and for the Board Chair an additional $33,000 of cash compensation in lieu of shares of common stock valued at $33,000. Directors’ Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Our equity compensation program for directors provides each director with an annual award of shares of our common stock without any restrictions. The aggregate value of the award for each non-employee director is $40,000 and the aggregate value of the award for the Board Chair is $66,000. Our directors are elected annually in June of each year. Accordingly, these grants of common stock to our current directors were scheduled for four equal installments on August 15, 2011,2013, November 15, 2011,2013, February 15, 20122014 and May 15, 2012.2014. In order to receive an installment of common stock, a director must be a current member of our Board of Directors on the scheduled installment payment date. To determine the number of shares of common stock to award based on this valuation, the value of each quarterly award, which is $10,000 for each director other than the Board Chair and $16,500 for the Board Chair, is divided by the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the common stock on the trading day prior to the grant date of the award. On August 15, 2011,2013, each incumbent non-employee director received 2,0892,703 shares of common stock and the Board Chair received an additional 1,3581,757 shares of common stock. On November 15, 2011,2013, each incumbent non-employee director received 2,2682,772 shares of common stock and the Board Chair received an additional 1,4741,801 shares of common stock. On During 2013, we discovered that we had inadvertently issued stock awards to our independent directors in excess of the 200,000-share limitation under our Amended and Restated 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Restated LTIP”) on the number of shares of our common stock that may be used for awards other than stock options or stock appreciation rights (the “Limitation’). The issuances of shares of our common stock in excess of the Limitation (the “Excess Shares”) occurred during 2010 and after and were disclosed and were properly accounted for in our periodic reports and proxy statements filed with the SEC. We issued a total of 179,512 Excess Shares to our independent directors in the form of outright stock grants or restricted stock awards as part of their annual retainers. Since the Excess Shares were issued in excess of the Limitation, they were not issued pursuant to the Restated LTIP and hence the issuances of the Excess Shares were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) by our Form S-8 registration statement for the Restated LTIP. Although the issuances of the Excess Shares were not registered under the Securities Act, the issuances of the Excess Shares qualified for an exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The issuances of the Excess Shares were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because those issuances did not involve a “public offering,” as defined in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act due to the small number of persons involved in the transaction, the size of the offering, the manner of the offering, the number of Excess Shares offered, the financial sophistication of our directors and their access to our financial information. Because of the limitation, we chose not to issue any additional shares of our common stock to our non-employee directors and accordingly paid our non-employee directors cash on February 15, 2012,2013 and on May 15, 2013. This cash compensation is $10,000 per quarter for each incumbent non-employee director received 2,127 shares of common stock andother than the Board Chair received an additional 1,382 shares.and $16,500 per quarter for the Board Chair. We submitted to our shareholders a proposal to amend our Restated LTIP to, among other things, increase the Limitation from 200,000 to 800,000 shares and a separate proposal to ratify the grant of the Excess Shares at our June 4, 2013 Annual Meeting. Both of these proposals were approved by our shareholders at the 2013 Annual Meeting. Our directors also have stock ownership guidelines which require them to hold 2,000 shares.shares of the Company’s stock. Directors have two years from election to achieve the required ownership. Furthermore, until the required stock ownership guidelines are met, directors are required to hold at least 50% of all vested after-tax shares and 50% of shares received on exercise of stock options. Currently, all of our non-employee directors meet the sharestock ownership guidelines.
Director Compensation for 20112013 The table below summarizes the compensation paid by us to our non-employee directors for their service during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. | | | | | | | | | Name (1) | | Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($) | | | Stock
Awards
($)(2)(3) | | Total
($) | Steven M. Anderson | | | 29,752 | | | 40,004 | | 69,756 | Patricia C. Barron | | | 36,252 | | | 40,004 | | 76,256 | James A. Croce | | | 29,752 | | | 40,004 | | 69,756 | Thomas L. Saeli | | | 40,878 | | | 40,004 | | 80,882 | Robert W. Shaw II | | | 35,878 | | | 40,004 | | 75,882 | Ranjit C. Singh | | | 37,378 | | | 40,004 | | 77,382 | Bradford T. Whitmore | | | 28,000 | | | 66,003 | | 94,003 |
| Name (1) | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | | | Stock Awards ($)(3)(4) | | | Total ($) | | | Steven M. Anderson | | | 55,753 | | | | 20,002 | | | | 75,755 | | | Patricia C. Barron (2) | | | 43,439 | | | | - | | | | 43,439 | | | James A. Croce (2) | | | 42,878 | | | | - | | | | 42,878 | | | Thomas L. Saeli | | | 61,440 | | | | 20,002 | | | | 81,442 | | | Robert W. Shaw II | | | 60,879 | | | | 20,002 | | | | 80,881 | | | Ranjit C. Singh | | | 58,879 | | | | 20,002 | | | | 78,881 | | | Bradford T. Whitmore | | | 60,000 | | | | 32,951 | | | | 92,951 | |
| (1) | Michael D. Popielec is ineligible to receive compensation for his service as a director because he is also an employee, serving as our President and Chief Executive Officer. |
| (2) | Patricia C. Barron and James A. Croce ceased being directors of the Company on June 3, 2013. |
| (3) | The amounts set forth in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards granted during 2011.2013. The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC 718”) (formerly, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment), requires us to recognize compensation expense for stock options and other stock-related awards granted to our employees and directors based on the estimated fair value of the equity awards at the time of grant. The compensation expense for such awards is expensed at the time of grant. There was no stock option expense in 20112013 for directors’ options since no stock options were granted to directors during 2011.2013. The assumptions used to determine the valuation of the awards are discussed in Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The number of shares granted in 2011 and the grant date fair value of those grants determined in accordance with ASC 718 are set forth below.2013. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Grant Date | | | Shares (#) | | | Grant Date
Fair Value ($) | | Steven M. Anderson | | | 2/15/11 | | | | 1,474 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 5/15/11 | | | | 2,227 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 8/15/11 | | | | 2,089 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | 11/15/11 | | | | 2,268 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | Patricia C. Barron | | | 2/15/11 | | | | 1,474 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 5/15/11 | | | | 2,227 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 8/15/11 | | | | 2,089 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | 11/15/11 | | | | 2,268 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | James A. Croce | | | 2/15/11 | | | | 1,474 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 5/15/11 | | | | 2,227 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 8/15/11 | | | | 2,089 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | 11/15/11 | | | | 2,268 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | Thomas L. Saeli | | | 2/15/11 | | | | 1,474 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 5/15/11 | | | | 2,227 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 8/15/11 | | | | 2,089 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | 11/15/11 | | | | 2,268 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | Robert W. Shaw II | | | 2/15/11 | | | | 1,474 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 5/15/11 | | | | 2,227 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 8/15/11 | | | | 2,089 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | 11/15/11 | | | | 2,268 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | Ranjit C. Singh | | | 2/15/11 | | | | 1,474 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 5/15/11 | | | | 2,227 | | | | 10,002 | | | | | 8/15/11 | | | | 2,089 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | 11/15/11 | | | | 2,268 | | | | 10,000 | | | | | | Bradford T. Whitmore | | | 2/15/11 | | | | 2,432 | | | | 16,503 | | | | | 5/15/11 | | | | 3,674 | | | | 16,500 | | | | | 8/15/11 | | | | 3,447 | | | | 16,500 | | | | | 11/15/11 | | | | 3,742 | | | | 16,500 | |
(3)(4) | The aggregate number ofThere were no non-employee director stock options outstanding at December 31, 2011 were as follows:2013. |
| | | | | Name | | Stock Options | | Steven M. Anderson | | | — - | | Patricia C. Barron
Thomas L. Saeli | | | 18,000- | | James A. Croce
Robert W. Shaw II | | | — - | | Thomas L. Saeli
Ranjit C. Singh | | | — - | | Robert W. Shaw II
Bradford T. Whitmore | | | — | | Ranjit C. Singh
| | | 30,000 | | Bradford T. Whitmore
| | | — - | |
Compensation DiscussionOverview We are currently considered a “smaller reporting company” for purposes of the SEC’s executive compensation and AnalysisIntroduction
Thisother disclosures. As such, we have opted to take advantage of the scaled disclosure requirements afforded to smaller reporting companies and, as a result, have provided more limited (or, in some cases, eliminated) disclosures that we have provided in prior years’ proxy statements. The executive compensation disclosures that follow comply with the SEC’s executive compensation disclosure rules for smaller reporting companies and therefore are generally more narrow in scope than the executive compensation disclosures and Compensation Discussion and Analysis whichthat we refer to as CD&A,have included in prior proxy statements.
Introduction This proxy statement provides information about the compensation programs for our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, our Vice President of Administration, Secretary and General Counsel and our former Vice President, Corporate Compliance Officer, to whomthose individuals we refer collectivelyhave identified as our “Named Executive Officers.”Officers” for 2013 in accordance with the executive compensation disclosure rules and regulations of the SEC for smaller reporting companies. This CD&Aproxy includes our compensation philosophy and the objectives of our executive compensation programs,rewards program, descriptions of each of the key elements of our executive compensation programsrewards program and the basis for the compensation decisions we made during 2011.2013. Our Named Executive Officers for 20112013 are: ·Michael D. Popielec, President and Chief Executive Officer ·Philip A. Fain, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and TreasurerSecretary On June 4, 2013, the Company and Peter F. Comerford, Vice President of Administration, Secretary and General Counsel, Patrick R. Hanna, Jr., Vice President, Corporate Compliance Officer (position eliminated June 29, 2011)
Messrs. Popielec, Fain, Comerford executed a Retirement and Hanna were our only Named Executive Officers for 2011. Although someConsulting Agreement, Release and Waiver of our other employees received total compensation in excess of $100,000 during 2011, none of these other employees is an executive officer as such term is defined under Rule 3b-7 of the Exchange Act.
Executive Summary
Our compensation philosophy is designed by our All Claims pursuant to which Mr. Comerford’s retirement became effective on May 28, 2013.
Compensation and Management Committee, which we refer to in this CD&A as the Committee, to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of our shareholders by rewarding performance that enhances the long-term objective of increasing shareholder value. Our executive compensation programs are designed to motivate our Named Executive Officers to achieve strong financial, operational and strategic performance and to provide a link between the amounts earned by our Named Executive Officers and the creation of shareholder value. We encourage you to read this CD&A for a detailed discussion and analysis of our executive compensation programs, including information about the 2011 compensation of our Named Executive Officers.2011 Financial Performance and Compensation Actions
We use GAAP operating income for purposes of determining achievement under our annual Short-Term Incentive Plan, which we refer to in this proxy statement as the STIP.
Our fiscal 2011 financial performance, along with the individual performance of our Named Executive Officers, served as key factors in making compensation decisions for 2011, including the following:
OverviewOur 2011 Named Executive Officer STIP (which excludes the President & CEO) is aligned directly to an annual corporate financial target in line with our “pay-for-performance” philosophy. For 2011, operating income of $10 million was the key metric for our Named Executive Officers annual cash incentive awards under the STIP. Our performance with respect to this metric was not met in 2011. Therefore, no short-term annual cash incentive awards were paid to such participating Named Executive Officers.
Our President & CEO Bonus Plan for 2011 was aligned directly to an annual corporate financial target in line with our “pay for performance” philosophy. For 2011, operating income of at least $10 million was the key financial metric for our President & CEO Bonus Plan. Our performance with respect to this metric was not met in 2011. As such, our 2011 performance resulted in no bonus being paid to our President & CEO.
Long-term equity incentive compensation continues to make up a significant portion of the compensation for each of our Named Executive Officers. During December 2010 (for the 2011 compensation year) and during 2011, long-term equity incentive compensation was granted solely in the form of stock options, as the Committee believed that stock options presented the best incentive to our Named Executive Officers to act in a manner designed to improve our market value by rewarding them only if our market value increases over the term of the stock option. Awards are based on position and performance. Our President & CEO makes recommendations with respect to the awards of the other executive officers, and the Committee determines the actual awards of the executive officers, including the President & CEO. See “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” and “2011 Grants of Plan Based Awards” below for the actual awards made.
Our executive compensation programs contain other key components and features that are designed to reinforce our pay-for-performance philosophy. For example:
We do not reimburse or “gross-up” our Named Executive Officers for any of the taxes associated with any of the compensation and benefits we provide to them.
We maintain “double-triggered” agreements with certain of our Named Executive Officers under which payment is triggered only by certain terminations of employment subsequent to a change in control of our company.
Effective May 25, 2011, we amended the Restated LTIP to modify the definition of “Change in Control” to make it clear that a “Change in Control” occurs only upon the consummation of certain events, as opposed to shareholder approval of an agreement providing for the event.
Grahall & Associates
We engaged an independent executive compensation consulting firm, Grahall & Associates, to work with senior management and the Compensation and Management Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) to establish an Executive Total Rewards Strategy,executive total rewards strategy, which is beingwas implemented in 2012. Grahall & Associates looked at the competitiveness of our pay practices by making peer group comparisons. They augmented the core peer group that we had used in the past with several additional organizations as some of the organizations in our original peer group had been lost to mergers and acquisitions. In addition to the core peer group analysis, they also provided analysis on a large sample of general technology organizations. Grahall & Associates presented several different potential reward strategies to the Compensation Committee for consideration. The basic premise of Grahall’sGrahall & Associates proposal was that the compensation must be tied to the overall business strategy and themust be amended to align with changes in business strategy over time. The program that is needed for today will more than likely not be the same program needed three years from now, again focusing on the business strategy. The recommended program is a transition model. Ithas been implemented more effectively allocates the scarce resources that we have across competing needs than does the currentdid our previous program. It recognizes that when resources are tight, resource allocation needs to be more surgical in nature.precisely targeted. This structure is designed to increase our capabilityability to recruit for key competitive advantage positions, motivate core executives to reposition our company and should promote the retention of high performers who can impact our business going forward. Grahall also prepared for us a report on director compensation, and has provided us since with compensation recommendations and market information on key sales position within our organization.
2011 Say-on-Pay Vote
At the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders, we held a non-binding shareholder vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, which we refer to as a Say-on-Pay vote, along with a non-binding vote to determine how often this vote should be held. At that meeting, a plurality of our shareholders expressed a preference that the Say-on-Pay vote take place triennially, as recommended
Our executive rewards program was designed by our Board of Directors. This preference was subsequently adopted by our Board of Directors and therefore the next Say-on-Pay vote will occur at the Company’s 2014 annual meeting of shareholders. The next required advisory vote on the frequency of our Say-on-Pay vote will occur no later than the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of shareholders.Also at the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders, our shareholders overwhelmingly approved the advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers with 99% of the shares entitled to vote voting in favor of our executive compensation program. TheCompensation Committee believes that this affirms our shareholders’ support of our approach to executive compensation. Based on the substantial shareholder support of our executive compensation program, the Committee did not change its approach to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers in 2011. The Committee remains open to any concerns expressed by our shareholders and will continue to consider the outcome of our future Say-on-Pay votes when making compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our compensation philosophy is designed to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of our shareholders by rewarding performance that enhances the long-term objective of increasing shareholder value, significantly grows the business, and executes our business strategy. Our executive rewards program is designed to motivate our executives, including our Named Executive Officers, to achieve strong financial, operational and strategic performance and to provide a link between the amounts earned by our executives and the creation of shareholder value. The Committee establishes specific annual, long-term and strategic goals and rewards Named Executive Officers for performance that meets or exceeds those goals. In addition, we expect our Named Executive Officers to work to these objectivesgoals while maintaining the highest ethical standards.
We design
The key components of our executive rewards program for our Named Executive Officers are base salary, annual short-term incentive plan (“STIP”) and long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”), combined with health and welfare benefits, retirement benefits, limited perquisites and other benefits. We seek to ensure that total executive compensation programsis aligned with corporate performance and the creation of shareholder value by placing an appropriate portion of an executive’s total compensation at risk, based on financial and non-financial performance measures and subject to the achievement of corporate and individual performance goals. Our executive rewards program is structured to attract, retain and motivate talented individuals, and to motivateincentivize them to achieve our business strategy with strong financial, operational and strategic performance. In particular: Our goal for 2011 was to have our compensation package reflect the value of the job in the marketplace, based on the compensation of our peer group (where a comparable position was available). To attract and retain a skilled work force, we must remain competitive with the pay of other employers who compete with us for talent.
Our executive compensation programs are designed to support our pay-for-performance philosophy by aligning compensation with executing long-term business strategies and
| | · | Our goal for 2013 was to have our executive rewards program reflect the measure of responsibility associated with the position not only in the marketplace, but within the organization based on the ability of the executive to promote the success of our business strategy and leverage our future growth. In reviewing market data, we looked not only at our peer group data but also at a broader group of technology-based organizations, recognizing that in order to attract and retain a skilled work force, we must remain competitive with the pay of other employers who compete with us for talent. |
| · | Our executive rewards program is also designed to support our pay-for-performance philosophy by aligning compensation with executing long-term business strategies (LTIP) and achieving near-term financial targets.and operational targets (STIP). We base compensation decisions on a combination of the levelcriticality of job responsibility,the position in the achievement of our business strategy, individual performance and our companycorporate performance. Generally, as an individual’s level of responsibility increases, so does the amount of variable compensation that is “at risk”at risk. |
| · | We administer our executive rewards program to foster the long-term focus required for success in our industry, but we also work to achieve an appropriate balance between short-term and dependent on achievement of such goals.long-term compensation in order to adequately motivate our executives. |
We develop and administer our compensation programs to foster the long-term focus required for success in our industry, but we also work to achieve an appropriate balance between short-term and long-term compensation in order to adequately motivate our employees.
To this end, the Compensation Committee reviews our executive compensationtotal rewards program annually to assess if we are achieving our business strategy, if we are able to attract and retain talented executives, and to ensure that the total compensation paid to our executives, including our Named Executive Officers, is fair, reasonable, competitive and where appropriate,appropriately performance-based. The Compensation Committee also ensures that our total compensation is linked to our abilitythe degree to which we meet our annual financial and non-financial goals and, longer term, to drive strong levelsour success in improving shareholder return. Our President & CEO makes recommendations with respect to the awards of shareholder return.Setting Executivethe other executive officer, and the Compensation
The following table identifies Committee determines the various individualsactual awards of the executive officers, including the President & CEO.
Our fiscal 2012 financial performance, our 2013 annual operating plan, and groups who participated in the compensation-setting process for 2011, as well as their responsibilities in connection with such participation. | | | Participant
| | Responsibilities
| | | Compensation and Management
Committee
| | • Responsible for establishing, implementing and monitoring adherence to our compensation philosophy and objectives for our Named Executive Officers
• Reviewed theindividual performance of our President & CEO and our other Named Executive Officers
• Engaged an independent executive compensation consulting firm, Grahall & Associates, to work with senior management and the Committee to establish an Executive Total Rewards Strategy which is to be implemented in 2012.
• Reviewed the peer group composition and compensation program evaluation prepared for the Committee in 2008 by DolmatConnell & Partners, an independent executive compensation consulting firm (reviewed 2010 for 2011 calendar year)
• Reviewed the peer group data compiled by Human Resources and obtained through Equilar, an independent executive compensation data provider
• Reviewed our President & CEO’s recommendations regarding the compensation levels of our other Named Executive Officers
• Approved the compensation levels and STIP payouts (if applicable) for our other Named Executive Officers (except for long-term equity incentive awards of more than 10,000 shares which require full Board approval)
• Made recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation levels and STIP payout for our President & CEO
| President & CEO | | • Reviewed the performance of our other Named Executive Officers
• Made recommendations to the Committee regarding the compensation levels, base salary, STIP, and LTIP for our other Named Executive Officers with input from our Vice President of Corporate Human Resources
|
Competitive Market Data
The Committee believes that the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, should be generally consistent withserved as key factors in making compensation decisions for 2013.
We continued the linkage between our Named Executive Officer STIP and achievement of annual corporate financial targets in 2013, reflecting our pay practices at comparable companies, in order to attractfor performance philosophy. As a result for 2013, corporate operating profit from continuing operations, and retain top management talent. Each year,corporate revenue were the Committee reviews the executive compensation practices of a group of public companies in our industry that it determines to be our peers based on their revenue and market capitalization. The data used for 2011 recommendations basically utilized the same peer group that was established by DolmatConnell for 2009 to include companies of similar size within our industry. The peer group we used for establishing our 2011 executive compensation programskey metrics for our Named Executive Officers wasOfficer annual cash incentive awards under the STIP. Corporate operating profit of $6.8 million comprised 90% of the following companies: | | | Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
| | LaBarge, Inc.
| | | Aero Vironmento, Inc. | | Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. | | | AZZ, Inc. | | Performed Line Products Co. | | | Bel Fuse, Inc. | | Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. | | | C&D Technologies, Inc. | | SL Industries Inc. | | | Electro Scientific Industries Inc. | | Spectrum Control, Inc. | | | EMCORE Corp. | | Vicor Corp. | | | Greatbatch, Inc. | | |
Peer group data for our 2011 executive compensation programs was obtained through Equilar, which is an executive compensation data provider that provides benchmark data on publicly held companies on executive compensation, equity grantsSTIP weighting and compensation practices. If peer group data iscorporate revenue of $117.3 million comprised the remaining 10% of the STIP weighting. The threshold levels of performance with respect to each of these metrics were not available on a specific Named Executive Officer’s position, we use a composite of published executive compensation surveys.
The Committee uses the peer group executive compensation data as a “market check” only. While the target compensation levels formet in 2013 and therefore, no short-term annual cash incentive awards were paid to our Named Executive Officers are not setfor 2013.
Long-term equity incentive compensation continued to correspond tomake up a specific levelsignificant portion of market competitiveness, the Committee’s general approach has been to align compensation with the 50th percentilefor each of our peer group. In addition, the Committee exercises significant discretionNamed Executive Officers. Awards are determined individually and judgment in determining individual compensation target levels and actual amounts paidare based on its overall understandingthe relative criticality of the labor market for executive leadership, our specific needsposition and eachthe Named Executive Officer’s individual circumstances.ability to implement changes designed to promote future growth. Executive Compensation ComponentsThe 2011 total compensation package for our Named Executive Officers consisted of the following primary components:
| | | | | Compensation Element
| | Form of Compensation
| | Purpose
| Base salary
| | Cash | | Provide compensation that is not “at-risk” to compensate our Named Executive Officers for services rendered during the fiscal year | | | | Annual incentive compensation
(STIP)/Bonus
| | Cash | | Motivate our Named Executive Officers to attain vital short-term business goals and objectives as reflected in our annual operating plan |
| | | | | Compensation Element
| | Form of Compensation
| | Purpose
| Long-term incentive compensation | | Equity | | Incent our Named Executive Officers to focus on company growth, align their compensation with our business strategy and create value for our shareholders | | | | Health and welfare plans | | Eligibility to receive health and other welfare benefits paid for by our company, including life insurance, short- and long-term disability insurance and a comprehensive medical and dental plan (we pay the monthly premiums for our Named Executive Officers) | | Provide a competitive employee benefits program | | | | Retirement benefits | | Eligibility to participate in our 401(k) plan (available to all employees) | | Provide an incentive for long-term retention of our Named Executive Officers | | | | Limited perquisites and other personal benefits | | A $7,500 benefits allowance for the President & CEO (and a $5,000 allowance for each of the other Named Executive Officers) for benefits such as supplemental long-term disability and company-paid executive physicals and tax preparation services | | Provide a competitive compensation package, facilitate strong, focused performance and better enable us to attract and retain superior employees for key positions |
Base Salary Our President & CEO reviews the performance of the other Named Executive OfficersOfficer and then recommends base salary adjustments, if any, to the Compensation Committee. In turn, the Compensation Committee independently reviews, adjusts where appropriate and approves the base salary adjustments, if any, based upon the subjective discretiondetermination of the Compensation Committee. In itsour Board’s executive session, the Committee reviews and recommends to the full Board any base salary adjustment for our President & CEO. If changes to base salaries are recommended and approved, the changes in the base salary are made to be effective duringfor a period ranging from twelve to fifteen months from the 1st quarterdate of the following calendar year.last increase based upon an executive’s performance. The Compensation Committee typically reviews base salary levels from the core peer group companies and other published executive compensation surveys (if required)the technology peer group on an annual basis. The Committee has endeavored to better align executive salaries with the market, moving them toward approximatelybetween the 25th and the 50thth percentile of our peer group, since base salaries for our executive officers have traditionally been significantlybelow market norms for comparable companies. In addition to looking at the peer group and other published executive compensation surveys,data, salaries for executivesour Named Executive Officers are determined based upon the following factors: Company performance
Job responsibilities, including any significant change in responsibilities
Experience
| · | Impact of position on achievement of the business strategy |
| · | Job responsibilities, including any significant change in responsibilities |
In December of 2010,March 2013, the Committee approved a base salary increasesincrease to Messrs.Mr. Fain and Comerford of 4.2%5.0% ($ 240,000260,000 to $250,000) and 10.0% ($210,000 to $231,000), respectively.$273,000). The merit increases wereincrease was approved by the Committee based on companyCompany and individual performance and also in consideration of the fact that both wereMr. Fain was positioned well below the 50th percentile of our peer group as established at the end of 2008. Following their respective increases in base salary, Messrs. Fain and Comerford’s base salaries still remain below the 50th50th percentile of our peer group. These increases became effective February 14, 2011.Following his increase in base salary, Mr. Fain’s base salary still remains below the 50th percentile of our peer group. Other than these adjustments, no changes were made to the base salaries of our Named Executive Officers during 2011 or early 2012.2013. Short-Term Incentive Plan 20112013President & CEO
Mr. Popielec was eligible to receive an annual cash bonus outside of the 2011 Executive STIP if we exceeded certain performance metrics that were to be agreed upon no later than January 31, 2011. In 2011, Mr. Popielec’s bonus was based on delivering 2011 operating income. His target bonus amount was 75% of his base salary or $337,500. Bonus payout ranges were from 0% to 140% of the target bonus amount based on the satisfaction of the bonus plan metric. Satisfaction of less than 80% of the bonus plan metric would result in no bonus being paid. Satisfaction of 80% to 99% of the bonus plan metric would in result in bonus ranges from 20% to 100% of the target bonus. Satisfaction of 100% to 125% of the bonus plan metric would result in bonus ranges from 100% to 140% of target bonus. The target bonus of $337,500 would be paid if operating income was equal to or greater than $10 million.
Computation of Bonus Metric for President & CEO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 80% | | 85% | | 90% | | 95% | | 100% | | 105% | | 110% | | 115% | | 120% | | 125% | Operating Income (in Millions) | | 8 | | 8.5 | | 9 | | 9.5 | | 10 | | 10.5 | | 11 | | 11.5 | | 12 | | 12.5 | % of Bonus Target | | 20% | | 40% | | 60% | | 80% | | 100% | | 108% | | 116% | | 124% | | 132% | | 140% | Bonus Payout Amount (in Thousands) | | $67.5 | | $135.0 | | $202.5 | | $270.0 | | $337.5 | | $364.5 | | $391.5 | | $418.5 | | $445.5 | | $472.5 |
Due to our financial performance in 2011, no STIP or bonus was paid to our President & CEO.
Computation of Bonus Metric for our Named Executive Officers (other than the President & CEO)
Typically, we establish a short-term incentive plan each fiscal year, which provides the Named Executive Officers an opportunity to receive an annual cash payment in addition to their base salaries. The short-term incentive plan is designed to place “at risk” a significant portion of the annual total cash compensation of the Named Executive Officers by linking the amount of compensation that can be achieved under the plan with our financial performance. We believe that the STIP is a key component of maintaining a competitive executive compensation program because it motivates our Named Executive Officers to achieve our short-term financial and strategic objectives while making progress towardstoward our longer term growth. Setting Threshold, Target Based on our total rewards strategy, those Named Executive Officers and Maximumother executives who, by virtue of their position in the Company, had the opportunity to make an immediate short term impact on the business and were instrumental in driving our operating results had more of their pay at risk in the STIP. These individuals also were tasked with balancing short term results and decisions with creating long term value.
President & CEO Mr. Popielec was eligible to receive an annual cash bonus in accordance with the 2013 Executive STIP LevelsInitially,if we exceeded certain performance metrics that were to be agreed upon no later than January 31, 2013. In 2013, Mr. Popielec’s bonus was based on meeting pre-established 2013 operating profit and corporate revenue goals. His target bonus amount was 75% of his base salary or $347,630. The STIP was structured with 90% of the weighting of the bonus based on 2013 operating profit goal of $6.8 million and 10% of the weighting of the bonus based on 2013 corporate revenue goal of $117.3 million. Achievement of less than 75% of the operating profit goal or corporate revenue goal resulted in no bonus being paid with respect to that metric. Achievement of 75% to 100% of the operating profit goal or corporate revenue goal would result in a bonus range payout from 50% to 100% of the target bonus for the metric with respect to which the 75% to 100% performance was achieved. Payout of 100% of the target bonus under the plan would be achieved by meeting the operating profit and corporate revenue goals. Achievement of over 100% to 125% of operating profit or corporate revenue goals would result in a bonus payout ranging from 100% to 150% of the target bonus with respect to the metric for which such performance level had been achieved. Mr. Popielec was eligible for a partial payment under the plan if one of the two metrics was achieved. Payout under the plan is capped at 150% of the target bonus. Due to our financial performance in 2013, no STIP bonus was paid to our President & CEO.
Other Named Executive Officers Based on the recommendation from the President & CEO, the Compensation Committee establishes threshold, target and maximum bonus levels for each Named Executive Officer, which is expressed as a percentage of his base salary. The percentages are determined by the position of the Named Executive OfficersOfficer within the organization and based upon the review of peer data and other published executive compensation surveys if peer data is not available.data. In 2013, the target for Mr. Fain was 45% of base salary. The threshold level isfor 2013 was the minimum level of performance required before any amount would be earned under the STIP, which is 80%75% of the companyCompany performance target (80%targets of $10 million = $8 million).operating profit and corporate revenue. The Compensation Committee also establishes a maximum bonus level under the STIP. For 2011,2013, that maximum bonus level was two times150% of the target bonus level. Generally, the Compensation Committee sets the target bonus level such that, assuming achievement of the corporate financial metric(s),metrics, the combined base salary and annual STIP opportunity for our Named Executive Officers will be at or near the 50thth percentile for comparable executives at the companies in our peer group or from published executive compensation surveys if peer group data is not available. Forgroup. In establishing the 2011 STIP,2013 total rewards strategy, the threshold, target and maximum levels under the STIP were as follows: | | | | | | | Name | | Threshold†
(as a % of
base salary) | | Target
(as a % of
base salary) | | Maximum
(as a % of
base salary) | Philip A. Fain | | 0% | | 45% | | 90% | Peter F. Comerford | | 0% | | 30% | | 60% | Patrick R. Hanna, Jr.* | | 0% | | 30% | | 60% |
† | Assumes Company does not make $8 million of operating income (80% of the company target of $10 million). |
* | Mr. Hanna’s position was eliminated effective June 29, 2011. |
Establishing the STIP Performance Metrics
Normally, at the DecemberCompensation Committee meeting, based on the recommendation fromapproved the President & CEO, the Committee identifies financial metrics that will be used for the STIP for the following calendar year. The metrics are normally finalized in January/February timeframe after the annual operating plan has been approved.
In setting 2011 executive compensation, theCEO’s recommendation was made by the President & CEO and approved by the Committee that all Named Executive Officers would have their STIP based on our operating income goal only.profit and corporate revenue goals. The threshold, target and maximum operating income performance under the 2011 STIP were as follows:
| | | | | | | Performance Metric
| | Threshold Goal
(80% of Operating
Income) | | Target Goal
(100% of Operating
Income) | | Maximum Goal
(217% of Operating
Income) | Operating Income
| | $8M | | $10M | | $21.7M |
No payout would be madepotential for 2011 if the company performance did not exceed 80%2013 was based on a percentage of the $10Named Executive Officer’s salary. The two metrics used for computation of the 2013 bonus for the other Named Executive Officers were company operating profit and corporate revenue, with 90% of the weighting of the bonus based on 2013 operating profit commitment of $6.8 million and 10% of the weighting of the bonus based on 2013 corporate revenue commitment of $117.3 million.
Achievement of less than 75% of the bonus plan metrics of operating income performance target. Performanceprofit goal or corporate revenue goal resulted in no bonus being paid for that metric. Achievement of 80%75% to 100% of the company performance targetbonus plan metrics of operating profit goal or corporate revenue goal would result in a bonus range payout of 0% to 50% of the target bonus amount. Performance from 100% to 122% of the company performance target would result in a bonus payout of 50% to 100% of the target bonus amount, increasing ratably as the company operating income increases. At 122%for that metric. Payout of 100% of the company performance target, participants would receive 100% of their target bonus amount. Performance between 122%under the plan would be achieved by meeting the operating profit and corporate revenue goals. Satisfaction of over 100% to 217%125% of the company performance targetbonus plan metrics of operating profit or corporate revenue goals would result in a bonus range payout of 100% to 200%150% of the target bonus amount, increasing ratably asfor that metric. Named Executive Officers were eligible for a partial payment under the company operating income increases. Performance in excessplan if one of 217% would result in a cap in bonus payout of 200%the two metrics was achieved. Payout under the plan is capped at 150% of the target bonus amount. Potential payouts to our Named Executive Officers other than our President & CEO at threshold target and maximum target were as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Payout at 80%
of Target | | Payout at
100% of Target | | | Payout at excess
of 217% of Target | | Philip A. Fain | | 0 | | $ | 56,250 | | | $ | 225,000 | | Peter F. Comerford | | 0 | | $ | 34,650 | | | $ | 138,600 | | Patrick R. Hanna, Jr. | | 0 | | $ | 28,500 | | | $ | 114,000 | |
STIP Payments
bonus. While the decisions to make STIP payouts as well as the amounts earned under the STIP are made at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, in making such determinations, the Compensation Committee relies onconsiders the recommendations from our President & CEO for all other Named Executive Officers. The Committee makes recommendations to the full Board for the STIP payout (if any) for the President & CEO. Due to our financial performance in 2011,2013, no STIP or bonus was paid to any of the other Named Executive Officers. Officer. Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation – Named Executive Officers other thanOther Than our President & CEO We use equity awards to motivate our Named Executive Officers to increase the long-term value of our common stock and, thereby, align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of our shareholders. Long-term equity incentive awards are intended to further our success by ensuring that sustainable value creation is a keysignificant factor into the amount of total compensation which our Named Executive Officers’ management of the business andOfficers may receive. We believe that linking long-term compensation to helpsustained value creation helps retain executives over time. Long-term equity incentive compensation may consist of equity such as awards of stock options, performance-vestedperformance vested restricted shares and time-vestedtime vested restricted shares that vest over a multi-year period. This design approach helps align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of our shareholders in seeingby linking the compensation of our Named Executive Officers to long-term increases in the value of equity instruments. We use stock options as one of our long-term incentives because, in addition to providing our executive officers with the opportunity to develop a stock ownership stake in our company, they result in compensation only to the extent that the market price of our common stock increases over the term of the stock option. The size and form of these equity awards was determined by the Committee with recommendations from the President & CEO for the other Named Executive Officers. If the equity awards recommended for the Named Executive Officer exceed 10,000 shares, the awards will be recommended for approval to the BoardOfficers was determined by the Compensation Committee in consultation with the President & CEO. In late 2011 and early 2012 the Board approvesCompensation Committee, based on recommendation of the actions. The Committee also recommends to the full Board anyPresident & CEO, issued large equity awards for the President & CEO.In the past, the Committee has based the overall long-term incentive compensation around the mid-point (50th percentile) of those companies in our peer group. As with other compensation components, however, the Committee can modify this target either upward or downward based on the Committee’s subjective evaluation of the long-term value of the individual Named Executive Officer to us. In December 2010 (as a component of the 2011 executive compensation program), the Committee approved only stock options, as more fully described below, in the belief that when granted with an exercise price at or above the current market price, stock options represent the best incentive to our Named Executive Officers as they were focused on the growth of the Company and meeting the Company’s strategic plan. Due to actthe size of these large equity awards issued in a manner designed to improve2011 and 2012, no equity awards were recommended or approved for our market value and to reward ourother Named Executive Officers only if the market value increases over the term of the stock option. In the past, the Committee has determined the value of long-term equity incentive compensation to be granted to each Named Executive Officer based on factors including the individual’s level of responsibility with our company and the results of the Committee’s annual evaluation of the individual’s performance, and then utilizes the peer group compensation data as a check on the competitiveness of the level of compensation.
The Committee recommended to the Board and the Board approved the granting of options to purchase shares of our common stock under our Restated LTIP to certain Named Executive Officers. Mr. Fain received an option to acquire 50,000 shares at an exercise price of $4.42 per share, with a seven-year term and vesting over a three-year period in equal installments; and Mr. Comerford received an option to purchase 26,000 shares at an exercise price of $4.42 per share, with a seven-year term and vesting over a three-year period in equal installments. Mr. Fain received an additional option to purchase 20,000 shares at an exercise price of $3.98 per share, with a seven-year term and vesting over a three-year period in equal installments. These grants were issued in accordance with our 2012 Executive Total Rewards Strategy. The determination of who receives long-term incentive awards and how many awards they receive is based on the criticality of their role, their performance, their potential and their ability to drive our long-term business strategy.
2013. Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation – President & CEO Long-term equity incentive compensation is a significant component of Mr. Popielec’sthe compensation package.package of our President & CEO. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Popielec received the following options to purchase shares of our common stock: | | | | | | | | | | | | Date of Grant | | Number
of Shares | | | Exercise
Price | | | Vesting Schedule | | December 30, 2010 | | | 50,000 | | | $ | 6.4218 | | | Twenty five percent of the shares will vest on each of the four anniversaries of the date of grant. | | January 3, 2011 | | | 50,000 | | | $ | 6.5820 | | | Twenty five percent of the shares will vest on each of December 30, 2011, December 30, 2012, December 30, 2013 and December 30, 2014. |
In addition,
| Date of Grant | Number of Shares | Exercise Price | Vesting Schedule | | | | | | | December 30, 2010 | 50,000 | $6.4218 | Twenty five percent of the shares will vest on each of the four anniversaries of the date of grant. | | | | | | | January 3, 2011 | 50,000 | $6.5820 | Twenty five percent of the shares will vest on each of December 30, 2011, December 30, 2012, December 30, 2013 and December 30, 2014. |
Mr. Popielec also received three additional stock options,option awards, each of which was conditioned upon shareholder approval of our Restated LTIP at our 2011 annual meeting. This approval was obtained inat our 2011 annual meeting, which was held in June 2011.meeting. As detailed below, most of these stock optionsoption awards were granted with an exercise price substantially above the grant date fair market value of our common stock. | | | | | | | | | | | Date of Grant | | Number
of Shares | | | Exercise
Price | | | Vesting Schedule | December 30, 2010 | | | 250,000 | | | $ | 6.4218 | | | Twenty five percent of the shares will vest on each of the four anniversaries of the date of grant. | December 30, 2010 | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 10.00 | | | Vesting begins on the date the stock first reaches a closing price equal to the exercise price for 15 trading days in a 30 trading-day period, with such vesting in equal amounts over the four anniversary dates of that date. | December 30, 2010 | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 15.00 | | | Vesting begins on the date the stock first reaches a closing price equal to the exercise price for 15 trading days in a 30 trading-day period, with such vesting in equal amounts over the four anniversary dates of that date. |
| Date of Grant | Number of Shares | Exercise Price | Vesting Schedule | | | | | | | December 30, 2010 | 250,000 | $6.4218 | Twenty five percent of the shares will vest on each of the four anniversaries of the date of grant. | | | | | | | December 30, 2010 | 200,000 | $10.00 | Vesting begins on the date our stock first reaches a closing price equal to the exercise price for 15 trading days in a 30 trading-day period, with such vesting in equal amounts over the four anniversary dates of that date. | | | | | | | December 30, 2010 | 200,000 | $15.00 | Vesting begins on the date the stock first reaches a closing price equal to the exercise price for 15 trading days in a 30 trading-day period, with such vesting in equal amounts over the four anniversary dates of that date. |
On January 29, 2013, our Board of Directors, on recommendation of our Compensation Committee, granted 120,000 restricted stock units (RSU’s) to our President & Chief Executive Officer, Michael D. Popielec, which grant was approved by our shareholders at our June 4, 2013 Annual Meeting, which vest and will convert to shares of our common stock as follows: | (1) | 30,000 shares of our common stock will be issued on the later of January 1, 2014 or the date when our common stock first reaches a closing price of $4.00 per share for 15 trading days in a 30 trading day period; |
| (2) | 30,000 shares of our common stock will be issued on the later of January 1, 2014 or the date when our common stock first reaches a closing price of $5.00 per share for 15 trading days in a 30 trading day period; |
| (3) | 30,000 shares of our common stock will be issued on the later of January 1, 2015 or the date when our common stock first reaches a closing price of $4.00 per share for 15 trading days in a 30 trading day period; and |
| (4) | 30,000 shares of our common stock will be issued on the later of January 1, 2015 or the date when our common stock first reaches a closing price of $5.00 per share for 15 trading days in a 30 trading day period. |
The 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued as described in (1) above on January 1, 2014. We provide to all active employees a tax-qualified 401(k) plan that provides for both employer and employee contributions. EmployeesUnder this plan, employees may defer annuallya portion of their base salary to the plan up to theannual IRS limits. We provide a company match of 50% of an employee’s deferrals, up to a maximum of 4% of the employee’s annual salary.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits We provide our Named Executive Officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that we and the Compensation Committee believesbelieve are reasonable and consistent with the objectives of our overall compensation program to better enable us to attract and retain superior employees for key positions. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to our Named Executive Officers.Officers to determine if they remain at appropriate levels.
The aggregate incremental costs of the personal benefits provided to our Named Executive Officers are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the 20112013 Summary Compensation Table.Other 2011 Compensation Actions
Relocation Benefits – President & CEO
Under his employment agreement, Mr. Popielec was also entitled to the following relocation benefits:
Rent and commuting transportation to the Rochester, New York area for up to nine months during 2011, as needed, for a total actual expense not to exceed $50,000.
Payment of all actual reasonable relocation and moving expenses incurred in 2011, including expenses incurred by Mr. Popielec and his spouse for travel to the Rochester, New York area to locate living accommodations, packing and transporting of household items to the new household and meals, lodging and travel in connection with the move to the new household, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $60,000.
Payment of all actual reasonable current house sale/closing costs, including deed preparation, tax stamps, reasonable attorneys’ fees, real estate transfer taxes and real estate commissions incurred in 2011 and 2012.
Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for 2011 In order to better align the interests of executive officers and shareholders, several years ago the Compensation Committee implemented stock ownership and retention guidelinesrequirements for executive officers. The stock ownership requirements for executive officers are as follows: | | | President & CEO | | 1.00 times salary | Chief Financial Officer | | 0.50 times salary | Other Executive Officers | | 0.33 times salary |
For 2011,2013, the Compensation Committee established the presumed share price at $5.59which is to be used for purposes of determining the minimum number of shares to be owned by the executive officers. This presumed price was $4.41 per share, which was based on the volume weighted average priceVWAP of our common stock for the two-year period ended December 31, 2010.2012. Each year the Compensation Committee will establish a new presumedprice per share to be used to determine the minimum number of share required to be held which price for the following yearper share will be based on the volume weighted average priceVWAP of our common stock for the preceding two-year period. Executive officers have three years to achieve the required holdings, which are based on the presumedprice per share price.as calculated above. Additionally, there are shareholding requirements which require that until the share ownership guidelines are met, executive officers must hold at leastare prohibited from disposing of more than 50% of all vested shares received from restricted share grants (on an after tax basis) and 50% of shares received on exercise of stock options. Shares owned by an executive, as well as shares underlying awards of stock options and restricted stock count towardsare treated as owned by the executive’s goal.executive for purposes of determining whether required ownership has been achieved. All Named Executive Officers have either met or are on target to meet their applicable stock ownership guidelines.The Committee is currently reviewing the Named Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines for 2012 to ensure that best practices are being used.
requirement. Deductibility of Executive Compensation As part of its role,responsibility, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code which provides that unless we comply with certain shareholder approval procedures, we may not deduct compensation of more than $1,000,000 that is paid to certain individuals. We believe that compensation paid under theour executive compensation plans is fully deductible for federal income tax purposes. However, in certain situations, the Compensation Committee may in the future approve compensation that will not meet these requirements in order to ensure competitive levels of total compensation for our executive officers.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Beginning on January 1, 2006, we began accounting for stock-based payments, including stock options and restricted stock awards, in accordance with the requirements of SFAS 123(R), now referred to as ASC 718. Compensation and Management Committee ReportThe Compensation and Management Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation and Management Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Compensation and Management Committee:
Ranjit C. Singh, Chair
Steven M. Anderson
James A. Croce
20112013 Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation awarded to, paid to or earned by the Named Executive Officers for all services in all capacities to us and our subsidiaries during 2009, 20102012 and 2011: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name and
Principal Position | | Year | | | Salary
($) | | | Bonus
($) | | | Stock
Awards
($)(1) | | | Option
Awards
($)(2)(3) | | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) | | | All Other
Compensation
($)(4) | | | Total
($) | | Michael D. Popielec (5) | | | 2011 | | | | 436,611 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,413,316 | | | | — | | | | 15,407 | | | | 1,865,334 | | President and Chief | | | 2010 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 193,831 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 193,831 | | Executive Officer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Philip A. Fain | | | 2011 | | | | 249,608 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 101,492 | | | | — | | | | 15,711 | | | | 366,811 | | Chief Financial Officer | | | 2010 | | | | 250,927 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 97,499 | | | | 107,705 | | | | 12,090 | | | | 468,221 | | and Treasurer | | | 2009 | | | | 240,538 | | | | — | | | | 22,501 | | | | 109,956 | | | | — | | | | 9,189 | | | | 382,184 | | Peter F. Comerford | | | 2011 | | | | 228,717 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 52,775 | | | | — | | | | 11,500 | | | | 292,992 | | Vice President of | | | 2010 | | | | 210,453 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 77,999 | | | | 62,828 | | | | 9,994 | | | | 361,274 | | Administration, Secretary
and General Counsel | | | 2009 | | | | 210,066 | | | | — | | | | 13,505 | | | | 69,345 | | | | — | | | | 11,529 | | | | 304,445 | | Patrick R. Hanna, Jr. (6) | | | 2011 | | | | 150,542 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 67,878 | | | | 218,420 | | Vice President, Corporate | | | 2010 | | | | 192,429 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 38,999 | | | | 56,844 | | | | 10,479 | | | | 298,751 | | Compliance Officer | | | 2009 | | | | 190,655 | | | | — | | | | 10,797 | | | | 42,460 | | | | — | | | | 9,883 | | | | 253,795 | |
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary ($) | | | Bonus ($)(2) | | | Option Awards ($)(3) | | | All Other Compensation ($)(4) | | | Total ($) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael D. Popielec | | 2013 | | | 463,507 | | | | 0 | | | | - | | | | 36,487 | | | | 499,994 | | | President and Chief | | 2012 | | | 459,265 | | | | 0 | | | | - | | | | 158,996 | | | | 618,261 | | | Executive Officer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Philip A. Fain | | 2013 | | | 267,500 | | | | 10,000 | | | | - | | | | 21,686 | | | | 299,186 | | | Chief Financial Officer, | | 2012 | | | 256,801 | | | | 0 | | | | 37,418 | | | | 10,892 | | | | 305,111 | | | Treasurer and Secretary | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Peter F. Comerford (1) | | 2013 | | | 122,453 | | | | 0 | | | | - | | | | 13,726 | | | | 136,179 | | | Vice President of | | 2012 | | | 236,535 | | | | 0 | | | | - | | | | 8,064 | | | | 244,599 | | | Administration, Secretary and General Counsel | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | The amount inOn June 4, 2013, the Stock Awards column is the grant date fair valueCompany and Peter F. Comerford executed a Retirement and Consulting Agreement, Release and Waiver of restricted share awards grantedAll Claims pursuant to our shareholder-approved Restated LTIP calculated in accordance with ASC 718. See Note 7which Mr. Comerford retired effective May 28, 2013. Under this agreement, the Company agreed to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K forpay Mr. Comerford his salary through July 27, 2013 and to continue to pay his medical and dental coverage at the fiscal year endedCompany’s cost through December 31, 2009 for2013. Consistent with the assumptions we used in valuingCompany’s retirement policy, Mr. Comerford will have the stock options granted during his tenure continue to vest and expensing these restricted share awards in accordance with ASC 718.retains all vested unexpired stock options until the relevant option term has expired. |
| (2) | Mr. Fain was awarded a $10,000 bonus for 2013 which was recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. |
| (3) | The amounts reported in the Option Awards column represent the grant date fair value of stock option awards granted pursuant to our shareholder-approved Restated LTIP calculated in accordance with ASC 718. See Note 7 to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 20102012 and 20112013 for the assumptions we used in valuing and expensing these stock options in accordance with ASC 718. |
(3) | Mr. Popielec’s 2011 stock option awards consist of stock options that were part of his compensation package that was approved by the Board of Directors in connection with the execution of his employment agreement, which was effective on December 30, 2010. Other than the two stock options for 50,000 shares each that were granted to Mr. Popielec on December 30, 2010 and January 3, 2011, the remaining stock options granted to Mr. Popielec in connection with his employment agreement were conditioned on shareholder approval of our Restated LTIP, which was approved at our annual meeting of shareholders on June 7, 2011. |
| (4) | All Other Compensation for 20112013 consists of the following: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 401(k) Plan
Employer
Match
($) | | | Other
Benefits (a)
($) | | | Total
($) | | Michael D. Popielec | | | 4,875 | | | | 10,532 | | | | 15,407 | | Philip A. Fain | | | 7,292 | | | | 8,419 | | | | 15,711 | | Peter F. Comerford | | | 5,269 | | | | 6,231 | | | | 11,500 | | Patrick R. Hanna, Jr. | | | 4,047 | | | | 5,367 | | | | 9,414 | |
| | | 401(k) Plan Employer Match ($) | | | Other Benefits (a) ($) | | | Total ($) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael D. Popielec | | | 5,100 | | | | 31,387 | | | | 36,487 | | | Philip A. Fain | | | 5,100 | | | | 16,586 | | | | 21,686 | | | Peter F. Comerford | | | 1,802 | | | | 11,924 | | | | 13,726 | |
| (a) | The “Other Benefits” column of the above table includes premiums paid for group medical and dental coverage life insurance and long-term care insurance. insurance, reimbursement for tax preparation and certain financial planning expenses. |
In addition to the items in the above table, in connection with the elimination of Mr. Hanna’s position on June 29, 2011, he received severance in the form of salary continuation in the amount of $58,464.
(5) | Mr. Popielec became our President and Chief Executive Officer effective December 30, 2010. |
(6) | Mr. Hanna’s position as Vice President, Corporate Compliance Officer was eliminated June 29, 2011, and Mr. Hanna ceased working for us on August 31, 2011. |
2011 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information concerning grants of plan-based awards to the Named Executive Officers during 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#) | | | Exercise
or Base
Price
of
Option
Awards
($/Sh) (3) | | | Closing
Market
Price
on
Grant
Date
($/Sh) | | | Grant
Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards (2) | | | | | | Name | | Type of Award | | Plan | | Grant
Date (1) | | | Approval
Date | | | Threshold
($) | | | Target
($) | | | Maximum
($) | | | | | | Michael D. Popielec | | Cash Incentive | | Executive
STIP | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 337,500 | | | | 472,500 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Option | | LTIP | | | 01/03/11 | | | | 12/30/10 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | 6.58 | | | | 6.60 | | | | 146,119 | | | | Option | | LTIP | | | 06/07/11 | | | | 12/30/10 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 250,000 | | | | 6.42 | | | | 4.93 | | | | 493,156 | | | | Option | | LTIP | | | 06/07/11 | | | | 12/30/10 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 200,000 | | | | 10.00 | | | | 4.93 | | | | 409,758 | | | | Option | | LTIP | | | 06/07/11 | | | | 12/30/10 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 200,000 | | | | 15.00 | | | | 4.93 | | | | 364,283 | | Philip A. Fain | | Cash Incentive | | STIP | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | 56,250 | | | | 225,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Option | | LTIP | | | 12/09/11 | | | | 12/09/11 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | 4.42 | | | | 4.45 | | | | 101,492 | | Peter F. Comerford | | Cash Incentive | | STIP | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | 34,650 | | | | 138,600 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Option | | LTIP | | | 12/09/11 | | | | 12/09/11 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 26,000 | | | | 4.42 | | | | 4.45 | | | | 52,775 | | Patrick R. Hanna, Jr. | | Cash Incentive | | STIP | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 28,500 | | | | 114,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Mr. Popielec’s stock options were part of his compensation package that was approved by the Board of Directors in connection with the execution of his employment agreement, which was effective on December 30, 2010. Other than the stock option for 50,000 shares that was granted to Mr. Popielec on January 3, 2011, the remaining stock options granted to Mr. Popielec during 2011 were conditioned on shareholder approval of our Restated LTIP, which was approved at our annual meeting of shareholders on June 7, 2011. |
(2) | For Mr. Popielec, the amounts in these columns represent the potential threshold, target and maximum bonus under the 2011 Executive STIP. For all other Named Executive Officers, the amounts in these columns represent the potential threshold, target and maximum bonus under the STIP. Under the terms of the STIP, the maximum award amount is payable as an overachievement award. As described in the CD&A, no amounts were earned under either the 2011 Executive STIP or the STIP based on 2011 performance. |
(3) | Other than the stock options granted to Mr. Popielec on June 7, 2011 with exercise prices of $10.00 and $15.00 per share, the exercise price of stock options granted on January 3, 2011, June 7, 2011 and December 9, 2011 is equal to the volume weighted average sales price of our common stock, as determined in accordance with the trading rules of the NASDAQ Global Market, on the respective date of grant. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2011
The following table sets forth information concerning the number of shares underlying exercisable and non-exercisable options outstanding at December 31, 2011 and unvested restricted stock awards outstanding at December 31, 2011 for our Named Executive Officers.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Option Awards | | | Stock Awards | | Name | | Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable | | | Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable | | | Option
Exercise
Price
($) | | | Option
Expiration
Date | | | Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#) | | | Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($) (1) | | Michael D. Popielec | | | 12,500 | | | | 37,500 | (2) | | $ | 6.4218 | | | | 12/30/2017 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 62,500 | | | | 187,500 | (3) | | | 6.4218 | | | | 12/30/2017 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12,500 | | | | 37,500 | (4) | | | 6.5820 | | | | 12/30/2017 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 200,000 | (5) | | | 10.0000 | | | | 01/24/2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 200,000 | (6) | | | 15.0000 | | | | 01/14/2020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Philip A. Fain | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 662 | (7) | | | 2,661 | | | | | 10,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 11.4217 | | | | 09/07/2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.7385 | | | | 03/07/2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,318 | | | | 2,658 | (8) | | | 12.1848 | | | | 01/14/2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 22,000 | | | | 11,000 | (9) | | | 3.9085 | | | | 12/04/2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,334 | | | | 16,666 | (10) | | | 6.9061 | | | | 12/03/2017 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 50,000 | (11) | | | 4.4218 | | | | 12/09/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Peter F. Comerford | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 397 | (12) | | | 1,596 | | | | | 1,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 17.1200 | | | | 03/31/2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 16.1500 | | | | 06/30/2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.9200 | | | | 09/30/2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 21,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.9600 | | | | 12/09/2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.0000 | | | | 12/30/2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.8500 | | | | 03/31/2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7,500 | | | | 0 | | | | 10.5500 | | | | 12/21/2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 13.4338 | | | | 12/07/2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,659 | | | | 1,329 | (8) | | | 12.1848 | | | | 01/14/2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 16,000 | | | | 8,000 | (13) | | | 3.9085 | | | | 12/04/2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6,667 | | | | 13,333 | (14) | | | 6.9061 | | | | 12/03/2017 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 26,000 | (15) | | | 4.4218 | | | | 12/09/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Patrick R. Hanna, Jr. | | | 500 | | | | 0 | | | | 17.1200 | | | | 03/31/2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 500 | | | | 0 | | | | 16.1500 | | | | 06/30/2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 500 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.9200 | | | | 09/30/2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11,500 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.9600 | | | | 12/09/2012 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Option Awards | | | Stock Awards | Name | | Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable | | | Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable | | | Option
Exercise
Price
($) | | | Option
Expiration
Date | | | Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#) | | Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($) (1) | | | | 500 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.0000 | | | | 12/30/2012 | | | | | | | | | 500 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.8500 | | | | 03/31/2013 | | | | | | | | | 7,500 | | | | 0 | | | | 10.5500 | | | | 12/21/2013 | | | | | | | | | 6,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 13.4338 | | | | 12/07/2014 | | | | | | | | | 2,216 | | | | 0 | | | | 12.1848 | | | | 01/14/2016 | | | | | | | | | 4,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 3.9085 | | | | 12/04/2016 | | | | | |
(1) | The amounts set forth in this column equal the number of time-based restricted stock awards indicated multiplied by the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2011 ($4.02). |
(2) | This stock option vested on December 30, 2011 with respect to 12,500 shares and will vest in equal installments of 12,500 shares on each of December 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014. |
(3) | This stock option vested on December 30, 2011 with respect to 62,500 shares and will vest in equal installments of 62,500 shares on each of December 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014. |
(4) | This stock option vested on December 30, 2011 with respect to 12,500 shares and will vest in equal installments of 12,500 shares on each of December 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014. |
(5) | This option will vest on the date our common stock first reaches a closing price of $10 for 15 trading days in a 30-day trading period, with such vesting in equal amounts over the four anniversary dates of that date. |
(6) | This option will vest on the date our common stock first reaches a closing price of $15 for 15 trading days in a 30-day trading period, with such vesting in equal amounts over the four anniversary dates of that date. |
(7) | The remaining 662 shares subject to this restricted stock award vested on January 14, 2012. |
(8) | This stock option vested on January 14, 2012 with respect to 2,658 shares for Mr. Fain and 1,329 shares for Mr. Comerford. |
(9) | This stock option will vest with respect to 11,000 shares on December 4, 2012. |
(10) | This consists of two stock option grants: one which will vest with respect to 4,769 shares on December 3, 2012 and another which will vest with respect to 3,564 shares on December 3, 2012 and with respect to 8,333 shares on December 3, 2013. |
(11) | This stock option will vest with respect to 16,667 shares on December 9, 2012, 16,666 shares on December 9, 2013 and 16,667 shares on December 9, 2014. |
(12) | The remaining 397 shares subject to this restricted stock award vested on January 14, 2012. |
(13) | This stock option will vest with respect to 8,000 shares on December 4, 2012. |
(14) | This stock option will vest in equal installments on December 3, 2012 and December 3, 2013. |
(15) | This stock option will vest with respect to 8,667 shares on December 9, 2012 and December 9, 2013 and 8,666 shares on December 9, 2014. |
2011 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth information concerning the number of shares of our common stock acquired and the value realized on vesting of restricted stock awards during 2011 by the Named Executive Officers. None of our Named Executive Officers exercised any stock options during 2011.
| | | | | | | | | | | | Stock Awards | | | | | Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#) | | | Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(1) | | Michael D. Popielec | | | — | | | | — | | Philip A. Fain | | | 1,262 | | | | 7,903 | | Peter F. Comerford | | | 797 | | | | 5,021 | | Patrick R. Hanna, Jr. | | | 718 | | | | 4,451 | |
(1) | The value realized on the vesting of stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares acquired. |
2011 Pension Benefits Table
We do not have any qualified or nonqualified defined benefit plans.
2011 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
We do not have any nonqualified defined contribution or other nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
On December 6, 2010, we enteredin connection with entering into an employment agreement with Mr. Popielec, which provides that, effective December 30, 2010 Mr. Popielec became our President and Chief Executive Officer, succeeding Mr. Kavazanjian. In connection with his appointment as our President and Chief Executive Officer, weOfficer. We set Mr. Popielec’s annual base salary at $450,000. Mr. Popielec is also eligible to receive an annual cash bonus outsideunder our short-term cash bonus incentive plan if we exceed certain quantitative and qualitative performance metrics to be agreed upon and approved by the Compensation Committee no later than January 31 of the year for which the bonus applies. Satisfaction of 80% to 99% of theThe bonus plan metrics will result in bonusgoals and payout ranges from 20% to 100% offor 2013 are set forth on Page 17 for Mr. Popielec’s target bonus. Satisfaction of 100% to 125% of the bonus plan metrics will result in bonus ranges from 100% to 140% of Mr. Popielec’s target bonus. In no event will the bonus exceed 140% of Mr. Popielec’s target bonus. For 2011 and each year thereafter, Mr. Popielec’s target bonus shall not be less than 75% of his 2011 base salary.Popielec. Mr. Popielec is also a participant in our Restated LTIP. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Popielec was granted options to purchase shares of our common stock. Certain of the options granted on December 30, 2010 were conditional and were subject to shareholder approval to increase the number of shares available under our Restated LTIP. Shareholder approval was obtained in June 2011. We
Mr. Popielec’s employment agreement also agreedprovided that Mr. Popieleche shall be entitled to the following relocation benefits: (i) rent in and commute transportation to the Rochester, New York area for up to nine months, as needed, during 2011 for a total actual expense not to exceed $50,000; (ii) payment of all actual reasonable relocation and moving expenses including expenses incurred by Mr. Popielec and his spouse for travel to the Rochester, New York area to locate living accommodations, packing and transporting of household items to the new household and meals, lodging and travel in connection with the move to the new household, incurred in 2011 in an aggregate amount not to exceed $60,000; and (iii) payment of all actual reasonable current house sale/closing costs including deed preparation, tax stamps, reasonable attorneys’ fees, real estate transfer taxes and real estate commissions incurred in 2011 and 2012. Mr. Popielec is also entitled to receive the retirement benefits, and fringeperquisites and other personal benefits described in this proxy statement under the sections entitled “Retirement Benefits” and “Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits”. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Popielec’s employment is “at will.” Mr. Popielec is entitled to certain severance benefits if we terminate his employment without Business Reasons or a Constructive Termination occurs (as those terms are defined in the employment agreement), including (i) salary continuation for a period of 1812 months following the termination date, provided, however, that such 18-month period shall be reduced to 12 months if the termination date is on or after June 30, 2012;date; (ii) a pro rata amount (calculated on a per diem basis) of the full-year bonus which Mr. Popielec would have earned for the calendar year in which the termination of employment occurs; (iii) acceleration of vesting of all outstanding stock options and other equity arrangements,awards, subject to the provision, however, that the acceleration shall not coverapply to the extent that the outstanding options and equity awards would otherwise have vested more than 18 months fromafter the termination date;date of termination; (iv) continuation of health benefits for Mr. Popielec, his spouse and any dependent children for a period of 12 months after the termination date followed by 18 months of executive-paid COBRA eligibility. In addition, if we terminate the employment of Mr. Popielec within 12 months offollowing the dateoccurrence of a Change in Control, without Business Reasons or if a Constructive Termination occurs (as those terms are defined in the employment agreement), then Mr. Popielec shall be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to (i) any earned but unpaid salary, any unpaid bonus from the prior year plus an amount equal to 18 months of his base salary as then in effect, payable immediately upon the termination date; (ii) one and one-half times his target bonus for the calendar year in which the termination date occurs; (iii) acceleration in full of vesting of all outstanding stock options, all such options to remain exercisable for 18 months following the termination date, or through the original expiration date of the stock options, if earlier; (iv) continuation of health benefits for Mr. Popielec, his spouse and any dependent children for a period of 24 months after the termination date. To the extent the vesting and/or accelerated payment of outstanding stock options would subject Mr. Popielec to the imposition of tax and/or penalties under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), the vesting and/or payment of such stock options and other equity shall be delayed to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of such tax and/or penalties. The employment agreement also provides for the continuation of certain benefits in the event Mr. Popielec’s employment is terminated for disabilityDisability (as defined in the employment agreement) or by his death. Mr. Popielec has also executed an Employee Confidentiality Non-Disclosure, No-Compete,Non-Compete, Non-Disparagement and Assignment Agreement in our standard form. Mr. Comerford
On April 27, 2007, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Comerford. Annually, our Compensation and Management Committee reviews Mr. Comerford’s salary and makes such adjustments as it deems appropriate in accordance with our executive compensation guidelines. The agreement automatically extends for successive one-year terms, unless either of the parties provides advance written notice of such party’s desire not to renew the agreement. Such written notice must be provided at least 90 days prior to the scheduled expiration date of the then current term of the agreement.
If we terminate Mr. Comerford’s employment agreement without “Business Reasons” (as defined in the employment agreement) or because Mr. Comerford experiences a “Disability” (as defined in the employment agreement), or if a “Constructive Termination” (as defined in the employment agreement) occurs, then Mr. Comerford will be entitled to the following benefits: (1) salary and the cash value of any accrued vacation (consistent with our vacation policies then effect) through the termination date of his employment plus continued salary for an additional 18 months; (2) an amount equal to the average of the bonuses paid to him during the two preceding fiscal years or, if no bonuses were paid during such period, an amount equal to his then current annual target bonus; and (3) acceleration of vesting of all outstanding stock options, and other equity arrangements subject to vesting and held by him, provided that the acceleration shall not cover more than two years from the termination date of his employment (and in this regard, all such options and other exercisable rights held by Mr. Comerford shall remain exercisable for one year following such termination date). In such circumstances, Mr. Comerford would also be entitled to continued health benefits at his cost for a period of 18 months.
If we terminate Mr. Comerford’s employment agreement within 18 months of the date of a “Change in Control” (as defined in the employment agreement), then Mr. Comerford will receive the same benefits as discussed above except that all of his outstanding stock options and equity arrangements will accelerate, even if the remaining vesting period is in excess of two years. If Mr. Comerford’s employment agreement is terminated because he experiences a “Disability” (as defined in the employment agreement) then Mr. Comerford will be entitled to the same benefits as described above except that he will only receive an amount equal to his then current annual target bonus, not the average of the bonuses paid to him during the two preceding fiscal years.
If Mr. Comerford’s employment agreement is terminated because of his death, his representatives will be entitled to (1) an amount equal to his annual target bonus for the fiscal year in which he died (plus any unpaid bonus from the prior fiscal year end); and (2) the acceleration of vesting of all outstanding stock options, and other equity arrangements subject to vesting and held by him, provided that the acceleration shall not cover more than two years from the termination date of his employment (and in this regard, all such options and other exercisable rights held by Mr. Comerford’s representatives shall remain exercisable for one year following such termination date).
In December 2008, Mr. Comerford’s employment agreement was amended to bring it into compliance with Section 409A of the Code. In July 2009, Mr. Comerford’s employment agreement was amended and restated to cap the severance benefits upon a specified change-in-control event at no more than three times Mr. Comerford’s average annual compensation for the previous five years to the extent necessary not to incur the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code and not limit our tax deduction under Section 280G of the Code (the “Tax Limitations”). In the event a severance benefit owed to Mr. Comerford exceeds the Tax Limitations, then we will determine which severance benefits are reduced so that such severance benefits are not subject to the Tax Limitations. Mr. Comerford’s employment agreement was also amended to, among other things: (i) clarify that restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights will be accelerated along with other equity arrangements (to the same extent described above) in the event of an (a) involuntary termination without Business Reasons or a Constructive Termination, (b) change in control or (c) termination upon death, as such terms are defined in his employment agreements; (ii) reflect our paid time off policy; and (iii) increase to 90 days the period of time Mr. Comerford can exercise vested stock options to coincide with the period of time set forth in the Restated LTIP.
We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Fain andFain. Mr. Comerford, who did not have an employment agreement, with Mr. Hanna.Severance Agreements
Mr. Hanna
Effective June 29, 2011, we decided to eliminate Mr. Hanna’s position as Vice President, Corporate Compliance Officer as part of our reorganization of management responsibilities. Mr. Hanna agreed to provide transition services to us through August 31, 2011, at which timeretired effective May 28, 2013, and his employment ended. On July 15, 2011, we executed anagreement was terminated by the Retirement and Consulting Agreement, Release and Waiver of All Claims with Mr. Hanna pursuant to which we agreed to pay him his salary through Maywas executed on June 4, 2013.
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 20122013 The following table sets forth information concerning the number of shares underlying exercisable and to continue his medical and dental coveragenon-exercisable options outstanding at our cost through MayDecember 31, 2012. In addition, Mr. Hanna was permitted to retain all stock options to the extent vested on August 31, 2011, which options will continue to be exercisable through the earlier of August 29, 2012 or the expiration of their term.Special Short-Term Severance and Change in Control Benefit
Certain2013 for our Named Executive Officers who did not have employment agreements with us were covered by a short-term severanceOfficers.
| | | Option Awards | Stock Awards | | Name | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested ($) | | Michael D. Popielec | | 37,500 | 12,500 (1) | $6.4218 | 12/30/2017 | 30,000 (9) | 106,500 | 60,000 (10) | 213,000 | | | | 187,500 | 62,500 (2) | 6.4218 | 12/30/2017 | | | | | | | | 37,500 | 12,500 (3) | 6.5820 | 12/30/2017 | | | | | | | | 0 | 200,000 (4) | 10.0000 | 01/24/2019 | | | | | | | | 0 | 200,000 (5) | 15.0000 | 01/14/2020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Philip A. Fain | | 10,000 | 0 | 11.4217 | 09/07/2014 | | | | | | | | 50,000 | 0 | 12.7385 | 03/07/2015 | | | | | | | | 7,976 | 0 | 12.1848 | 01/14/2016 | | | | | | | | 33,000 | 0 | 3.9085 | 12/04/2016 | | | | | | | | 25,000 | 0 | 6.9061 | 12/03/2017 | | | | | | | | 33,333 | 16,667 (6) | 4.4218 | 12/09/2018 | | | | | | | | 6,667 | 13,333 (7) | 3.9797 | 01/03/2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Peter F. Comerford | | 6,000 | 0 | 13.4338 | 12/07/2014 | | | | | | | | 3,988 | 0 | 12.1848 | 01/14/2016 | | | | | | | | 24,000 | 0 | 3.9085 | 12/04/2016 | | | | | | | | 20,000 | 0 | 6.9061 | 12/03/2017 | | | | | | | | 17,334 | 8,666 (8) | 4.4218 | 12/09/2018 | | | | |
| (1) | This stock option will vest with respect to 12,500 shares on December 30, 2014. |
| (2) | This stock option will vest with respect to 62,500 shares on December 30, 2014. |
| (3) | This stock option will vest with respect to 12,500 shares on December 30, 2014. |
| (4) | This stock option will vest on the date our common stock first reaches a closing price of $10 for 15 trading days in a 30-day trading period, with such vesting in equal amounts over the four anniversary dates of that date. |
| (5) | This stock option will vest on the date our common stock first reaches a closing price of $15 for 15 trading days in a 30-day trading period, with such vesting in equal amounts over the four anniversary dates of that date. |
| (6) | This stock option will vest with respect to 16,667 shares on December 9, 2014. |
| (7) | This stock option vested with respect to 6,667 shares on January 3, 2014 and will vest with respect to 6,666 shares on January 3, 2015. |
| (8) | This stock option will vest with respect to 8,666 shares on December 9, 2014. |
| (9) | 30,000 of these RSUs will vest on January 1, 2015. |
| (10) | If the closing price of our common stock is at or above $5.00 per share for a period of 15 trading days in any 30 day trading period, 30,000 of these RSUs will vest on the next business day. An additional 30,000 of these RSUs will vest on the later of January 1, 2015 or the first business day following a period of 15 trading days occurring in any 30 day trading period in which our common stock has closed at or above a price of $5.00 per share. |
Retirement Benefits and change-in-control benefit that was put in place by the Board of Directors to alleviate any concerns that key management employees might have with their future employment opportunities with us as a result of the retirement of our former President and CEO, John Kavazanjian, and the search for his successor. This benefit was not intended to be a “permanent benefit” and was initially put in place for a period of one year. The Board of Directors determined to discontinue the benefit effective September 2011.Potential Payments upon Termination and/or a Change in Control The table below outlines certainonly arrangement that we maintain that provides for retirement benefits is our tax-qualified defined contribution 401(k) plan. The material terms of our tax-qualified defined contribution 401(k) plan are summarized above under the heading “Retirement Benefits.” All of the potential payments and benefits payable by us to those of our Named Executive OfficersOfficer who were employed by us during 20112013 in the event of various scenarios involving either a termination of employment and/or change in control.control are pursuant to the employment agreement with Mr. Popielec or the Restated LTIP. The amounts disclosed assume the Named Executive Officer’s terminationemployment agreement with Mr. Popielec is summarized above under the various scenarios occurred on December 31, 2011. The valueheading “Employment Arrangements.” We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Fain, and Mr. Comerford retired in 2013. Under the award agreements issued under the Restated LTIP, outstanding unvested stock options, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units immediately vest upon the stock awards is based on the closing priceoccurrence of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on December 30, 2011, which was $4.02. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Triggering Event | | Salary
Continuation
($) | | | Bonus
Payment
($) | | | Accelerated
Restricted
Stock
Awards
($) | | | Accelerated
Stock
Options
($) | | | Health Care
Continuation
($) | | | Gross-Up
Payment
($) | | | Total
($) | | Michael D. Popielec(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Involuntary Termination without Business Reasons or Constructive Termination | | | 675,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,391 | | | | — | | | | 686,391 | | Involuntary Termination without Business Reasons or Constructive Termination within 12 months of the date of a Change in Control | | | 675,000 | | | | 506,250 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 22,781 | | | | — | | | | 1,204,031 | | Change in Control | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | Disability | | | 450,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,391 | | | | — | | | | 461,391 | | Death | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | | Philip A. Fain(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Involuntary Termination without Cause | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | Involuntary Termination without Cause within 12 months of the date of a Change in Control | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | Change in Control | | | | | | | | | | | 2,661 | | | | 1,227 | | | | | | | | — | | | | 3,888 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Triggering Event | | Salary
Continuation
($) | | | Bonus
Payment
($) | | | Accelerated
Restricted
Stock
Awards
($) | | | Accelerated
Stock
Options
($) | | | Health Care
Continuation
($) | | | Gross-Up
Payment
($) | | | Total
($) | | Peter F. Comerford (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Involuntary Termination without Business Reasons or Constructive Termination | | | 346,500 | | | | 34,650 | | | | 1,596 | | | | 892 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 383,638 | | Involuntary Termination without Business Reasons or Constructive Termination within 18 months of the date of a Change in Control | | | 346,500 | | | | 34,650 | | | | 1,596 | | | | 892 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 383,638 | | Change in Control | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,596 | | | | 892 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,488 | | Disability | | | 346,500 | | | | 34,650 | | | | 1,596 | | | | 892 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 383,638 | | Death | | | — | | | | 34,650 | | | | 1,596 | | | | 892 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 37,138 | | | | | | | | | | Patrick R. Hanna, Jr.(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Involuntary Termination without Cause | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
(1) | All amounts appearing in this table for Messrs. Popielec and Comerford are made pursuant to their employment agreements with us. The employment agreements are summarized above under the heading “Employment Arrangements.” With respect to the acceleration of restricted stock awards and stock options, the acquisition of 51% of our outstanding shares of common stock by any one person or group will be deemed a “Change in Control” pursuant to the employment agreements. |
(2) | All amounts appearing in this table for Mr. Fain are made under the award agreement under our Restated LTIP. With respect to the acceleration of restricted stock awards and stock options, the acquisition of 30% of our outstanding shares of common stock by any one person or group will be deemed a “Change in Control” pursuant to award agreements under our Restated LTIP. |
(3) | The severance benefits received by Mr. Hanna are described under the heading “Severance Agreements” above. These severance benefits were made pursuant to the short-term severance and change-in-control benefit summarized above. Because such benefit was eliminated effective September 2011 and this table shows what Mr. Hanna would have received in the event of his termination on December 31, 2011, this table shows no severance benefits were payable. |
a “Change in Control.” RATIFY THE SELECTION OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The firm of BDO USA, LLP, independent registered public accountants, served as our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with the audit of our financial statements for 20102012 and 2011.Our Audit and Finance Committee has selected BDO USA,Bonadio & Co., LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2012. 2013.
This selection of Bonadio & Co., LLP to serve as our independent registered public accountant will be presented to our shareholders for their ratification at the Meeting. Our Board of Directors recommends a vote in favor of the proposal to ratify this selection, and the persons named in the enclosed proxy (unless otherwise instructed therein) will vote such proxiesFOR this proposal. If the shareholders do not ratify this selection, the Audit and Finance Committee will seek to identify and address the reason or reasons why the shareholders did not ratify the committee’s selection and will consider such reason or reasons in selecting an independent public accounting firm for 2013.2014. We have been advised by BDO USA,Bonadio & Co., LLP that they will have a representative will be present at the Meeting andwho will be available to respond to appropriate questions. In addition, we intend to give such representativerepresentatives an opportunity to make any statements if he or shethey should so desire.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services Aggregate fees for professional services rendered for us by BDO USA, LLP and Bonadio, & Co., LLP for 20102012 and 20112013 were: | | | | | | | | | | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | Audit Fees | | $ | 462,703 | | | $ | 363,736 | | Audit-Related Fees | | | 0 | | | | 7,000 | | Tax Fees | | | 10,608 | | | | 0 | | All Other Fees | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | $ | 473,311 | | | $ | 370,736 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | BDO USA, LLP | | | Bonadio & Co., LLP | | | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | Audit Fees | | | $365,618 | | | | $49,929 | | | | $0 | | | | $172,878 | | | Audit – Related Fees | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 8,250 | | | Tax Fees | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 74,004 | | | | 40,275 | | | All Other Fees | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 84,370 | | | | 0 | | | Total | | | $365,618 | | | | $49,929 | | | | $158,374 | | | | $221,403 | |
Audit fees for 20102012 and 2011,2013, respectively, were for professional services rendered for the audits of our consolidated financial statements, audits of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, consents income tax provision procedures and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC.
Audit-Related Fees There were no audit-related fees for 2010.
Audit-related fees in 2013 were for 2011 consistedthe audit of fees incurred in connection with our filing of a registration statement on Form S-8.401(k) defined contribution plan for the year ended December 31, 2012. Tax fees for 2010 were for services relatedrelate to corporate and expatriate tax compliance, including the preparation of tax returns and claims for refund, and tax planning, and tax advice.
All Other Fees There were no
In 2012, other fees were for 2010services in support of our internal audit, the audit of our 401(k) defined contribution plan for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2011.to prepare our quarterly and annual income tax provisions. All of the services were completed prior to the appointment of Bonadio & Co., LLP as principal auditor for 2013 and were subject to audit by BDO USA, LLP. Our Audit and Finance Committee has not adopted pre-approval policies and procedures for audit and non-audit services. The engagement of BDO USA, LLP for tax services during 2010 and 2011was limited to circumstances where those services were considered integral to the audit services that it provided or where there was another compelling rationale for using BDO USA, LLP. Although no pre-approval policy was in effect, all audit, audit-related and permitted non-audit services for which BDO USA, LLP wasand Bonadio & Co., LLP were engaged were pre-approvedreviewed and approved prior to the commencement of the services by our Audit and Finance Committee in compliance with applicable SEC requirements.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE The duties and responsibilities of the Audit and Finance Committee are set forth in our Audit and Finance Committee Charter, a copy of which is available on our website athttp://investor.ultralifecorporation.com under the subheading “Corporate Governance.” Among other things, the Audit and Finance Committee reviews the adequacy of our systemssystem of internal controlscontrol regarding financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures and preparing our consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Audit and Finance Committee recommends to our Board of Directors that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, approves our quarterly filings on Form 10-Q and selects the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our books and records. The Audit and Finance Committee has: Reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for 2011 with our management and with BDO USA, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm for 2011;
| | •· | Reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for 2013 with our management and with Bonadio & Co., LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm for 2013; |
| | · | Discussed with BDO USA,Bonadio & Co., LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA,Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T; and |
Received from BDO USA, LLP the written disclosures and the letter from BDO USA, LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit and Finance Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with BDO USA, LLP their independence.
| · | Received from Bonadio & Co., LLP the written disclosures and the letter from Bonadio & Co., LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit and Finance Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Bonadio & Co., LLP their independence. |
The Audit and Finance Committee met with our independent accountants with and without management present and discussed with them the results of their examinations, their evaluations of our internal control over financial reporting, our disclosure controls and procedures and the quality of our financial reporting. Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit and Finance Committee concluded that BDO USA,Bonadio & Co., LLP is independent and recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20112013 for filing with the SEC.
The Audit and Finance Committee:
Thomas L. Saeli, Chair Patricia C. Barron
Steven M. Anderson PROPOSAL 3 APPROVE THE NEW 2014 LTIP In order to provide adequate flexibility to meet future long-term compensation needs, our Board of Directors approved a new LTIP as the successor plan to the existing Restated LTIP which expires on June 10, 2014. The new LTIP is substantially consistent with the Restated LTIP (as amended) which it replaces. The description of the new LTIP set forth below is a summary, does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions of the new LTIP itself. The complete text of the new LTIP is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement. Unless otherwise defined in this summary, capitalized terms used in this summary have the meanings given such terms in the new LTIP. The following table provides certain important information concerning our existing equity compensation plans of the Company as of December 31, 2013: Equity Compensation Plan Information | Plan Category | Number of securities to be used upon exercise of outstanding options (a) | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options (b) | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans, excluding securities reflected in column (a) (c) | | Equity Compensation Plans approved by security holders | 2,079,622 | $6.85 | 255,678 | | Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | 50,000(1) | $12.74 | — | | Total | 2,391,000 | $7.24 | 255,678 |
| (1) | On March 7, 2008, in connection with his becoming employed by us, we granted Mr. Fain an option to purchase 50,000 shares of our Common Stock at $12.74 per share outside any of our equity-based compensation plans. This fully vested option expires on March 7, 2015. |
Summary of New LTIP Purpose: The purpose of our new LTIP is to replace the Restated Plan and provide our Employees, Directors and Consultants who are in a position to contribute to our long-term success, with equity based incentive awards in accordance with the terms specified. The incentive program which is available under the terms of the new LTIP will cause those persons to increase their interest in our welfare and aid in attracting and retaining Employees, Directors and Consultants of outstanding ability. Term: The effective date of the new LTIP shall be the date of such approval by the Corporation’s stockholders which is scheduled for June 3, 2014, the date of our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Awards may not be granted under the new LTIP after June 2, 2024, but awards theretofore granted may extend beyond that date. Administration: The new LTIP is administered by our Compensation and Management Committee, or such other committee as may be designated by our Board of Directors (the “Committee”); provided, however, that the Committee shall consist of not less than two directors who are “non-employee directors,” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. The Committee may allocate all or any portion of its responsibilities and powers under the Restated LTIP to any one or more of its members, our Chief Executive Officer or other senior members of management as the Committee deems appropriate; however, only the Committee may select and grant awards to participants who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The Committee has broad authority in its administration of the new LTIP, including, but not limited to, the authority to interpret the plan; to establish rules and regulations for the operation and administration of the plan; to select the plan participants to receive awards; to determine the type, size, terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions of awards, including, without limitation, terms regarding vesting, exercisability, assignability, expiration and the effect of certain events, such as a change of control in the Company or the participant’s death, disability, retirement or termination from the Company or breach of agreement by a participant; and to take all other action it deems necessary or advisable to administer the new LTIP. Notwithstanding the Committee’s broad authority to administer the new LTIP and the awards issued under the new LTIP, the exercise price of any stock option or stock appreciation right granted pursuant to the new LTIP may not be subsequently “repriced” without shareholder approval. The term “reprice” means: (1) the reduction, directly or indirectly, in the per-share exercise price of an outstanding stock option or stock appreciation right by amendment, cancellation or substitution; (2) the cancellation of a stock option or stock appreciation right when its exercise price exceeds the fair market value of the underlying Common Stock in exchange for another stock option, stock appreciation right or other equity security (unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with a merger, acquisition, or similar transaction); or (3) the taking of any other action that is treated as a repricing under United States generally accepted accounting principles or by the rules or regulations of any stock exchange on which our securities are traded. The term “reprice” shall not include adjustments made to awards by the Committee upon the occurrence of certain events (as described under “Adjustments Upon Certain Events’’ below). To facilitate the granting of awards to participants who are employed or retained outside of the United States, the Committee will be authorized to modify and amend the terms and conditions of an award to accommodate differences in local law, policy or custom. Eligibility: All of our employees, directors and consultants are eligible to participate in the new LTIP; provided, however, only employees are eligible to receive incentive stock options. Participants in the new LTIP will be selected by the Committee from those eligible persons who are in a position to have a material impact on our results of operations. Participants may be selected and awards may be made at any time during the ten-year period following the effective date of the new LTIP. As of December 31, 2013, approximately two executive officers, 80 other employees, and five outside directors were eligible to participate in the current LTIP. The selection of those persons within a particular class who will receive awards is entirely within the discretion of the Committee. The Committee has not yet determined how many persons are likely to participate in the new LTIP. The Committee intends, however, to grant most of the new LTIP’s awards to those persons who are in a position to have a significant direct impact on our growth, profitability and success of the Company, which would include the participants in our Restated LTIP. Shares Available: A total of 1,750,000 shares of Common Stock will be available for grant of awards under the new LTIP. However, of the total number of shares of Common Stock available for awards under the new LTIP, no more than 800,000 shares of Common Stock may be used for awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights. The new LTIP authorizes the Committee to make equitable adjustments to the authorized number and class of securities to be issued under the new LTIP upon the occurrence of certain events, as described under “Adjustments Upon Certain Events’’ below. Types of Awards: Awards under the new LTIP may be in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, unrestricted stock and other equity-based awards, or any combination thereof. All awards granted to participants under the new LTIP shall be evidenced by an award agreement which specifies the type of award granted pursuant to the new LTIP, the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the award and all of the terms governing the award, including, without limitation, terms regarding the vesting, exercisability, forfeiture and expiration of the award. The Committee has exclusive power and authority, consistent with the provisions of the new LTIP, to establish the terms and conditions of any award and to waive any such terms or conditions. Award Limits. The maximum number of shares with respect to which awards may be paid or granted during each calendar year to any given participant may not exceed 150,000 shares of Common Stock, except inducement grants to new executives and key employees in amounts not to exceed 700,000 shares are not subject to the 150,000 share annual limitation. The new LTIP authorizes the Committee to make equitable adjustments to the number of shares with respect to which awards may be paid or granted during each calendar year to any given participant under the new LTIP upon the occurrence of certain events, as described under “Adjustments Upon Certain Events’’ below. Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee may grant awards under the new LTIP in the form of stock options to purchase shares of Common Stock, which stock options may be non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options for federal income tax purposes. Any stock option granted in the form of an incentive stock option must satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. Stock options shall be vested and exercisable at such times and upon such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee, but in no event shall a stock option be exercisable more than ten years (five years for incentive stock options issued to certain Control Persons) after the date it is granted. The exercise price per share of Common Stock for any stock option awarded shall not be less than 100 percent (110 percent for incentive stock options issued to certain Control Persons) of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the day the stock option is granted, except for stock options granted in assumption or replacement of outstanding awards in connection with specified corporate transactions. A stock option may be exercised by paying the exercise price in cash or its equivalent, or, to the extent permitted by the Committee, shares of Common Stock, a combination of cash and shares of Common Stock or through the delivery of irrevocable instruments to a broker to sell the shares of Common Stock obtained upon the exercise of the stock option and to deliver to us an amount equal to the exercise price. The Committee may grant stock appreciation rights independent of (“Freestanding SARs”) or in conjunction with (“Tandem SARs”) a stock option. The exercise price of a stock appreciation right shall be an amount determined by the Committee, but in no event shall such amount be less than the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the stock appreciation right is granted or, in the case of Tandem SARs, the exercise price of the related stock option. Each Freestanding SAR shall entitle the participant upon exercise to an amount equal to (i) the excess of (A) the fair market value on the exercise date of one share of Common Stock over (B) the exercise price, times (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock as to which the stock appreciation right is exercised. Each Tandem SAR shall entitle the participant to surrender the related stock option and to receive an amount equal to (i) the excess of (A) the fair market value on the exercise date of one share of Common Stock over (B) the exercise price per share of Common Stock, times (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock covered by the related stock option which is surrendered. Payment of the exercise price of a stock appreciation right may be made to us in shares of Common Stock or in cash or partly in shares of Common Stock and partly in cash, as determined by the Committee. Stock-Based Awards and Restricted Stock Units: The Committee, in its sole discretion, may grant stock awards (shares of restricted stock or unrestricted stock) or RSU’s and other awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based on the fair market value of, the Common Stock. Such stock-based awards shall be in such form, and dependent on such conditions, as the Committee shall determine, including, without limitation, the right to receive, or vest with respect to, one or more shares of Common Stock (or the equivalent cash value of such shares of Common Stock) upon the completion of a specified period of service, the occurrence of an event and/or the attainment of performance objectives. The restricted period specified in respect of any stock award shall not be less than three years, except that the Committee may (i) provide for the restricted period to terminate at any time after one year upon the attainment of performance-based objectives, and (ii) grant stock awards of up to 30,000 shares of Common Stock without regard to this limitation. Furthermore, the Committee may not terminate the restrictions applicable to outstanding stock awards except in connection with a Change in Control. The Committee may grant an unrestricted stock award only if the Committee determines that such stock award is made in lieu of all or a portion of salary or cash bonus of comparable value. Withholding: We are entitled to deduct from any payment to a participant under the new LTIP the amount of all applicable income and employment taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such payment or may require the participant to pay to us such tax prior to and as a condition of the making of such payment. Subject to certain limitations, the Committee may allow a participant to pay the amount of taxes required by law to be withheld from an award by withholding shares of Common Stock to be paid under such award or by permitting the participant to deliver to us shares of Common Stock having a fair market value equal to the amount of such taxes. Adjustments Upon Certain Events: In the event of any reclassification, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, reorganization, issuance of warrants, rights or debentures, stock dividend, stock split or reverse stock split, cash dividend, property dividend, combination or exchange of shares, repurchase of shares or any other change in corporate structure which in the judgment of the Committee materially affects the value of the Common Stock, the Committee may determine the substitutions or adjustments to the maximum number of shares available for the grant or issuance of awards under the new LTIP, the maximum award payable under the new LTIP, the number and class of shares and the exercise price per share set forth in any award theretofore granted, or any other affected terms of an award or the new LTIP as the Committee deems equitable or appropriate. Effect of Certain Events: The Committee will have the authority to promulgate rules and regulations to determine the treatment of a participant’s award in the event of the participant’s death, disability or termination. In addition, the Committee shall have the right to extend the period for exercise of any stock option or stock appreciation right, provided such extension does not result in an exercise period for any such stock option or Tandem SAR, which exceeds ten years from the date of grant. Unless otherwise decided by the Committee and provided in an award agreement, upon a participant’s death or disability prior to the complete exercise of the stock options or stock appreciation rights granted to him or her under the new LTIP, any such remaining stock options or stock appreciation rights may be exercised within one year after the date of the participant’s death or disability and prior to the expiration of the term thereof, to the extent exercisable on the date of the participant’s death or disability. Unless otherwise decided by the Committee and provided in an award agreement, upon a participant’s termination for any reason other than death or disability prior to the complete exercise of the stock options or stock appreciation rights granted to him or her under the new LTIP, any such remaining stock options or stock appreciation rights may be exercised within three months after the date of the participant’s termination and prior to the expiration of the term thereof, to the extent exercisable on the date of the participant’s termination. Amendment and Termination.: The Board of Directors may, at any time, alter, amend, suspend, discontinue or terminate the new LTIP; provided, however, that no such action shall adversely affect the rights of participants to awards previously granted hereunder and, provided further, however, that any shareholder approval necessary or desirable in order to comply with tax, securities, or other applicable laws or regulations, including, but not limited to, the listing requirements of the stock exchanges on which our securities are listed, shall be obtained in the manner required therein. In addition, the Board of Directors may, at any time and for any reason, with or without prior notice, amend the new LTIP in any manner, but may not without shareholder approval, adopt any amendment which would: (1) increase the number of shares available under the new LTIP; (2) expand the types of awards available; (3) expand the class of persons eligible to participate; (4) extend the term of the new LTIP; (5) materially amend the new LTIP, including, but not limited to, changing the method of determining the exercise price of options issued under the new LTIP; (6) allow for repricing of options or SARs; or (vii) terminate restrictions applicable to awards (except in connection with a grantee’s death, disability or termination of employment or connection with a change in control). New Plan Benefits Because the benefits conveyed under the new LTIP will largely be at the discretion of the Committee, it is not possible to determine what benefits participants will receive under the new LTIP. Tax Status of New LTIP Awards Introduction: The following discussion of the United States federal income tax consequences of awards under the new LTIP, as proposed, is based on present federal tax laws and regulations and does not purport to be a complete description of the federal income tax laws. Participants may also be subject to certain foreign, state and local taxes which are not described below. Incentive Stock Options: Pursuant to the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, only employees are eligible to receive incentive stock options. If a stock option is an incentive stock option, no income is realized by the employee upon grant or exercise of the incentive stock option (except possibly for alternative minimum tax), and no deduction is available to us at such times. If the Common Stock purchased upon the exercise of an incentive stock option is held by the employee for at least two years from the date of the grant of such incentive stock option and for at least one year after exercise, any resulting gain is taxed at long-term capital gains rates. Any amount realized by the employee in excess of the fair market value of the Common Stock at the time of exercise is taxed at capital gains rates. If the Common Stock purchased pursuant to the incentive stock option is disposed of before the expiration of that period, any gain on the disposition, up to the difference between the fair market value of the Common Stock at the time of exercise and the exercise price of the incentive stock option, is taxed at ordinary rates as compensation paid to the employee, and we are entitled to a deduction for an equivalent amount. Non-Qualified Options: If a stock option is a non-qualified option, no income is realized by the participant at the time of grant of the non-qualified stock option, and no deduction is available to us at such time. At the time of exercise (other than by delivery of previously-owned shares of Common Stock to us), ordinary income is realized by the participant in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, and the Company receives an income tax deduction for the same amount. If a non-qualified stock option is exercised by delivering previously-owned shares of Common Stock to us, the number of shares received by the participant equal to the number of shares so delivered are received tax-free and have a tax basis and holding period equal to the shares so delivered. The fair market value of the additional shares received by the participant is taxable to the participant as ordinary income, and the participant’s tax basis in such shares is their fair market value on the date of exercise. Upon disposition, any appreciation or depreciation of the Common Stock after the date of exercise may be treated as capital gain or loss depending on how long the shares have been held. Stock Appreciation Rights: No income is realized by a participant at the time a stock appreciation right is granted, and no deduction is available to us at such time. When the stock appreciation right is exercised, ordinary income is realized in the amount of the cash or the fair market value at such time of the shares of Common Stock received by the participant, and we are entitled to a deduction of equivalent value. Unrestricted Stock and Unrestricted Stock-Based Awards: Upon the grant of an award of shares of unrestricted stock or another stock-based award which is not restricted, a participant realizes taxable income equal to the cash and fair market value at such time of the shares of Common Stock received by the participant under such award (less the purchase price, if any), and we are entitled to a corresponding tax deduction at that time. Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock-Based Awards: Upon the grant of an award of shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units or another stock-based award which is restricted, no income is realized by a participant (unless a participant timely makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to accelerate the recognition of the income under any such award to the date of grant), and we are not allowed a deduction at that time. When the award vests and is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture for income tax purposes, the participant realizes taxable ordinary income in an amount equal to the cash and the fair market value at the time of vesting of the shares of Common Stock received by the participant under such award (less the purchase price therefor, if any), and we are entitled to a corresponding deduction at such time. If a participant makes an election, as permitted under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, within 30 days after the date of the transfer by us to the participant of the shares of restricted stock, then the participant recognizes taxable ordinary income in an amount equal to the cash and the fair market value at the time of grant of the shares of Common Stock to be received by the participant under such award (less the purchase price therefor, if any), and we are entitled to a corresponding deduction at such time. Stock Price The closing price of our Common Stock reported on the Nasdaq Stock Market on April 11, 2014, was $3.61 per share. Required Vote and Board of Directors’ Recommendation We believe that our best interests will be served by the approval of Proposal 3. The new LTIP will enable us to grant stock and other new forms of long-term incentive awards to employees, directors and consultants which will enhance our ability to retain and compete for new talent. Approval of Proposal 3 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of shares of the Common Stock represented at the Meeting. Our Board of Directors recommends a vote in favor of the proposal to approve the new LTIP, and the persons named in the enclosed proxy (unless otherwise indicated therein) will vote such proxies FOR this proposal. Our Board of Directors does not intend to present, and has not been informed that any other person intends to present, any matters for action at the Meeting other than those specifically referred to in this proxy statement. If any other matters properly come before the Meeting, it is intended that the holders of the proxies will act in respect thereof in accordance with their best judgment.
Other than Mr. Popielec, whose information is set forth with the other directors standing for election, the names of, and certain information with respect to, our executive officers who are not director nominees are presented below. | Name | Age | | | | | | Name
| | Age | | | Present Principal Occupation and Employment History | | | | Peter F. Comerford
| | | 54 | | | Mr. Comerford was named Vice President of Administration and General Counsel on July 1, 1999 and was elected Corporate Secretary in December 2000. He joined us in May 1997 as Senior Corporate Counsel and was appointed Director of Administration and General Counsel in December of that year. Prior to joining us, Mr. Comerford was a practicing attorney for approximately fourteen years having worked primarily in municipal law departments including the City of Niagara Falls, New York where he served as the Corporation Counsel. Mr. Comerford has a B.A. from the State University of New York at Buffalo, an MBA from Canisius College and a J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law. | | | | Philip A. Fain | | | 57 | | 59 | Mr. Fain was named Chief Financial Officer in November 2009, and Treasurer in December 2009.2009 and Corporate Secretary in April 2013. He previously served as Vice President of Business Development, having joined us in February 2008. Prior to joining us, he was Managing Partner of CXO on the GO, LLC, a management-consulting firm, which he co-founded in November 2003 and which we retained in connection with our acquisition activity. Prior to founding CXO on the GO, LLC, Mr. Fain served as Vice President of Finance - RayBan Sunoptics for Luxottica, SpA. Prior to the acquisition of Bausch & Lomb’s global eyewear business by Luxottica, Mr. Fain served as Bausch & Lomb’s Senior Vice President Finance - Global Eyewear from 1997 to 1999 and as Vice President and Controller for the US Sunglass business from 1993 to 1996. In these roles, he led the process to acquire some of the World’s most sought after sunglass companies and brands for Bausch & Lomb. From 1983 to 1993, Mr. Fain served in various positions with Bausch & Lomb including executive positions in corporate accounting, finance and audit. Mr. Fain began his career as a CPA and consultant with Arthur Andersen & Co. in 1977. He received his B.A. in Economics from the University of Rochester and an MBA from the William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration of the University of Rochester. | | | | | Peter F. Comerford | 56 | Mr. Comerford retired effective May 28, 2013. He was named Vice President of Administration and General Counsel on July 1, 1999 and was elected Corporate Secretary in December 2000. He joined us in May 1997 as Senior Corporate Counsel and was appointed Director of Administration and General Counsel in December of that year. Prior to joining us, Mr. Comerford was a practicing attorney for approximately fourteen years having worked primarily in municipal law departments including the City of Niagara Falls, New York where he served as the Corporation Counsel. Mr. Comerford has a B.A. from the State University of New York at Buffalo, an MBA from Canisius College and a J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS The table below shows certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock as of April 13, 201211, 2014 by each person known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding shares of our common stock, with percentages based on 17,384,43517,526,229 shares issued and outstanding. | | | | | | | | | Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | | Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned | | | Percent of Class
Beneficially Owned | | Bradford T. Whitmore (1) | | | 5,128,158 | | | | 29.5 | % | 1560 Sherman Avenue, Suite 900 | | | | | | | | | Evanston, IL 60201 | | | | | | | | | | | | Eliot Rose Asset Management, LLC (2) | | | 1,099,441 | | | | 6.3 | % | 1000 Chapel View Boulevard | | | | | | | | | Cranston, RI 02920 | | | | | | | | | | | | Artis Capital Management, L.P. (3) | | | 1,056,628 | | | | 6.1 | % | One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower, Floor 27 | | | | | | | | | San Francisco, CA 94105 | | | | | | | | | | | | NGP Energy Technology Partners II, L.P. (4) | | | 910,804 | | | | 5.2 | % | 1700 K Street NW, Suite 750 | | | | | | | | | Washington, D.C. 20006 | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | | Percent of Class Beneficially Owned | | | | | | | | Bradford T. Whitmore (1) | | 5,156,034 | | 29.4% | | 1560 Sherman Avenue, Suite 900 | | | | | | Evanston, IL 60201 | | | | | | | | | | | | NGP Energy Technology Partners II, L.P. (2) | | 950,721 | | 5.4% | | 1700 K Street NW, Suite 750 | | | | | | Washington, D.C. 20006 | | | | |
| (1) | This information as to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock is based on the Schedule 13D/A (Amendment No. 6)Form 4 dated May 23, 2011February 18, 2014 filed with the SEC by Grace Brothers, Ltd., an Illinois limited partnership, Bradford T. Whitmore individually and as general partner of Grace Brothers, Ltd. and as manager and sole voting member of Sunray I, LLC, Spurgeon Corporation, itsas general partners,partner of Grace Brothers, Ltd. and Sunray I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that reports beneficial ownership of 5,117,4605,156,034 shares of our common stock and Section 16 reports filed by Mr. Whitmore individually after May 23, 2011.stock. In the Schedule 13D/A dated May 23, 2011,February 17, 2014, Mr. Whitmore reports sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 4,598,8444,637,418 of such shares.shares, of which 4,452,283 shares are held in the name of Sunray I, LLC. Grace Brothers, Ltd., Mr. Whitmore and Spurgeon Corporation report shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 518,616 of such shares. |
| (2) | This information as to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock is based on the Schedule 13G dated January 13, 2012 filed with the SEC by Eliot Rose Asset Management, LLC, a Rhode Island limited liability company, and Gary S. Siperstein. Eliot Rose Asset Management, LLC is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the reported securities pursuant to separate arrangements whereby it acts as investment adviser to certain persons. Gary S. Siperstein is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the reported securities pursuant to his ownership interest in Eliot Rose Asset Management, LLC. Eliot Rose Asset Management, LLC and Gary S. Siperstein each report sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to all 1,099,441 shares. |
(3) | This information as to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock is based on the Schedule 13G dated February 14, 2012 filed with the SEC by Artis Capital Management, L.P., a California limited partnership. Artis Capital Management, L.P., a registered investment adviser, serves as investment adviser to various investment funds that directly hold the reported securities for the benefit of the investors in those funds. Artis Capital Management, L.P. reports sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to all 1,056,628 shares. |
(4) | This information as to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock is based on Amendment No. 12 to Schedule 13G dated February 10, 201214, 2013 filed with the SEC by NGP Energy Technology Partners II, L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership which owns the reported securities), NGP ETP II, L.L.C., the general partner of NGP Energy Technology Partners II, L.P, Energy Technology Partners, L.L.C., the sole manager of NGP ETP II, L.L.C., and Philip J. Deutch, the sole member and manager of Energy Technology Partners, L.L.C. and the manager of NGP ETP II, L.L.C. Mr. Deutch is also a member of the investment committee of NGP ETP II, L.L.C. NGP Energy Technology Partners II, L.P. reports sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all 910,804950,721 shares. By virtue of the relationships between and among the reporting persons, NGP ETP II, L.L.C., Energy Technology Partners, L.L.C. and Mr. Deutch may be deemed to have the power to direct the voting and disposition of the shares of common stock beneficially owned by NGP Energy Technology Partners II, L.P. NGP ETP II, L.L.C., Energy Technology Partners, L.L.C. and Mr. Deutch disclaim beneficial ownership of the reported securities except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT The table below shows certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock as of April 13, 201212, 2014 by (1) each of our directors, (2) each of our Named Executive Officers (as defined on page 17)under the heading “Executive Compensation”), and (3) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. | | | | | | | | | Name of Beneficial Owner (1) | | Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned (1) | | | Percent of Class
Beneficially Owned (2) | | Steven M. Anderson | | | 16,043 | | | | * | | Patricia C. Barron (3) | | | 140,861 | | | | * | | James A. Croce | | | 13,901 | | | | * | | Michael D. Popielec (4) | | | 187,500 | | | | * | | Thomas L. Saeli | | | 17,043 | | | | * | | Robert W. Shaw II | | | 15,316 | | | | * | | Ranjit C. Singh (5) | | | 82,389 | | | | * | | Bradford T. Whitmore (6) | | | 5,128,158 | | | | 29.5 | % | Peter F. Comerford (7) | | | 99,496 | | | | * | | Philip A. Fain (8) | | | 149,596 | | | | * | | Patrick R. Hanna, Jr. (9) | | | 49,370 | | | | * | | All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons) (10) | | | 5,899,673 | | | | 33.3 | % |
| Name of Beneficial Owner (1) | | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (1) | | | Percent of Class Beneficially Owned (2) | | | | | | | | | | | Steven M. Anderson | | | 32,938 | | | | * | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael D. Popielec | | | 466,280 | (3) | | | 1.2 | % (7) | | | | | | | | | | | | Thomas L. Saeli | | | 42,188 | | | | * | | | | | | | | | | | | | Robert W. Shaw II | | | 34,563 | | | | * | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ranjit C. Singh | | | 74,284 | | | | * | | | | | | | | | | | | | Bradford T. Whitmore | | | 5,156,034 | (4) | | | 29.4 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | Philip A. Fain | | | 227,262 | (5) | | | * | | | | | | | | | | | | | All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (7 persons) | | | 6,038,549 | (6) | | | 32.0 | % (7) |
___________________________ | (1) | Except as otherwise indicated, the shareholders named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them. The information provided in this table is based upon information provided to us by such shareholders. The table reports beneficial ownership for our directors and executive officers in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act. This means all our securities over which directors and executive officers directly or indirectly have or share voting or investment power are listed as beneficially owned. The amounts also include shares that may be acquired by exercise of stock options prior to June 12, 2012,11, 2014, which shares are referred to in the footnotes to this table as “shares subject to options that may be exercised.” |
| (2) | Based on 17,384,43517,526,229 shares issued and outstanding. |
| (3) | The amount shown includes (i) 6,200 shares held jointly by Ms. Barron and her husband; (ii) 20,000 shares held in the Patricia C. Barron Profit Sharing Plan; and (iii) 15,000 shares subject to options that may be exercised by Ms. Barron. |
(4) | The amount shown includes 87,500262,500 shares subject to options that may be exercised by Mr. Popielec.Popielec prior to June 11, 2014. |
(5) | The amount shown includes 25,000 shares subject to options that may be exercised by Mr. Singh. |
(6)(4) | The amount shown includes 518,616 shares beneficially owned by Grace Brothers, Ltd., an Illinois limited partnership, which shares are held in a securities margin account.account, and Spurgeon Corporation, which is a general partner of Grace Brothers, Ltd. Mr. Whitmore is a general partner of Grace Brothers, Ltd. See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” above for more information about Grace Brothers, Ltd. |
(7)(5) | The amount shown includes 65,155 shares subject to options that may be exercised by Mr. Comerford. |
(8) | The amount shown includes 98,310165,976 shares subject to options that may be exercised by Mr. Fain. |
(9)(6) | The amount shown includes 33,216433,476 shares subject to options that may be exercised by Mr. Hanna. The reported amount is based on information available to the company, including Mr. Hanna’s most recent Section 16 report dated December 3, 2010,Directors and may not reflect Mr. Hanna’s beneficial ownership as of April 13, 2012.Executive Officers. |
(10)(7) | The amount shown includes 324,181Percentages exclude shares subject to options that may be exercised by directorsDirectors and executive officers.Executive Officers. |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of beneficial ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of our common stock and our other equity securities. To our knowledge, based solely on the written representations of our directors and executive officers and the copies of such reports filed with the SEC during 2011,2013, all Section 16(a) filings applicable to our officers, directors and more than 10% beneficial owners were filed in a timely manner except for one Form 4 filing for our Chief Executive Officer and one Form 4 filing for Ms. Barron, each reporting three transactions, that were inadvertently filed late.manner. SUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS Under Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, shareholder proposals intended for inclusion in the proxy statement for our 20132015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be submitted in writing to us to our Corporate Secretary at 2000 Technology Parkway, Newark, New York 14513, and must behave been received by December 27, 2012.22, 2014. Any shareholder proposal submitted for consideration at our 20132014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders butnot submitted for inclusion in the proxy statement for that meeting that is received by us after March 12, 2013December, 2014 will not be considered filed on a timely basis with us under Rule 14a-4(c)(1) of the Exchange Act. For such proposals that are not timely filed, we retain discretion to vote proxies we receive. For such proposals that are timely filed, we retain discretion to vote proxies we receive provided that we include in our proxy statement advice on the nature of the proposal and how we intend to exercise our voting discretion and the proponent of any such proposal does not issue its own proxy statement. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011,2013, as filed with the SEC, is included in the 20112013 Annual Report to Shareholders which accompanies this proxy statement.April 26, 2012
| April 21, 2014 | By Order of the Board of Directors
Bradford T. Whitmore
Chair of the Board of Directors
| | | | | | | ULTRALIFE CORPORATION
2000 Technology Parkway
Newark, NY 14513
| | VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
|
| | | | | | | TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
| | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For
All
| | Withhold
All
| | For All
Except
| | To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. | | | | | | | | | | | The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1. Election of Directors | | | | ¨ | | ¨ | | ¨ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Nominees
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 01 Steven M. Anderson 02 Patricia C. Barron 03 James A. Croce 04 Michael D. Popielec 05 Thomas L. Saeli | | | | | | | 06 Robert W. Shaw II 07 Ranjit C. Singh 08 Bradford T. Whitmore
| | | | | The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:
| | For | | Against | | Abstain | | | | | 2. To ratify the selection of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | NOTE:The proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments thereof.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date | | | | | | Signature (Joint Owners) | | Date | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report/Form 10-K Wrap is/are available atwww.proxyvote.com.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
| | —
| 
| | ULTRALIFE CORPORATION
2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
June 5, 2012
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors.
The undersigned hereby appoints Philip A. Fain and Peter F. Comerford, and each of them, as proxy for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of the Common Stock of Ultralife Corporation owned by the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 5, 2012 at 9:00 A.M., local time, at Crystal City Marriott, Reagan National Airport, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202-3526, and at any adjournments of such meeting, on the matters listed in this proxy and described in the notice of annual meeting and proxy statement and upon such other business as may properly come before such meeting and any adjournments thereof.
This proxy is solicited on behalfDirectorsBradford T. Whitmore Chair of the Board of Directors of the Company and each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting has been proposed by the Board of Directors of the Company. This proxy will be voted as specified by the undersigned. This proxy revokes any prior proxy given by the undersigned. Unless authority to vote for one or more of the nominees is specifically withheld according to the instructions, a signed proxy will be voted FOR the election of the eight named nominees for director and FOR the ratification of the selection of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. The undersigned acknowledges receipt with this proxy of a copy of the notice of annual meeting and proxy statement dated April 26, 2012, describing more fully the proposals set forth in this proxy.
| | |
APPENDIX A ULTRALIFE CORPORATION 2014 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
Section l. Purpose.
Effective June 10, 2004, Ultralife Corporation (hereinafter the “Corporation”) adopted a long term incentive plan known as 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Predecessor Plan”). The Predecessor Plan will expire by its terms on June 10, 2014. All awards granted pursuant to the terms of the Predecessor Plan shall continue in full force and effect according to their respective terms. The Ultralife 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan (hereinafter the “Plan”) replaces the Predecessor Plan and provides the Corporation a vehicle which will enable it to provide Employees, Directors and Consultants of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries, who are in a position to contribute to the long-term success of the Corporation, with equity based incentive awards in accordance with the terms specified herein. The Corporation believes that the incentive program which is available to the Corporation under the terms of the Plan will cause those persons to increase their interest in the Corporation’s welfare and aid in attracting and retaining Employees, Directors and Consultants of outstanding ability.
Section 2. Definitions.
Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following terms, when used in the Plan, shall have the meanings set forth in this Section 2:
(a) “Award” shall mean any Option, SAR, Stock Award, Restricted Stock Units or other incentive award granted under the Plan, whether singly, in combination, or in tandem, to a Grantee by the Committee pursuant to such terms, conditions, restrictions and/or limitations, if any, as the Committee may establish by the Award Agreement or otherwise.
(b) “Award Agreement” shall mean the document establishing the terms, conditions, restrictions and limitations of an Award in addition to those established by the Plan and by the Committee’s exercise of its administrative powers.
(c) “Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
(d) “CEO” shall mean the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.
(e) “Change in Control” shall mean the occurrence of any of the following: (i) any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act (hereinafter a “Person”)) is or becomes a “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule l3d-3 under the Exchange Act (hereinafter a “Beneficial Owner”), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Corporation representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting power of the then outstanding securities of the Corporation; and (ii) the consummation of (A) a merger or consolidation of the Corporation with another corporation where the stockholders of such corporation, immediately after the merger or consolidation, own shares entitling such stockholders to more than fifty percent (50%) of all votes (without consideration of the rights of any class of stock to elect Directors by separate class vote) to which all stockholders of the corporation issuing cash or securities in the merger or consolidation would be entitled in the election of directors or where the members of the board of directors of such corporation, immediately after the merger or consolidation, constitute a majority of the board of directors of the corporation issuing cash or securities in the merger or consolidation, or (B) the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all the assets of the Corporation, or a liquidation, dissolution or statutory exchange of the Corporation.
(f) “Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as it may be amended from time to time.
(g) “Committee” shall mean the Compensation and Management Committee of the Board, or such other Board committee as may be designated by the Board to administer the Plan; provided that the Committee shall consist of not less than two Directors who are “Non-Employee Directors,” as that term is defined and interpreted pursuant to Rule l6b-3 under the Exchange Act. The Committee shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board.
(h) “Consultant” shall mean any consultant, advisor or independent contractor retained by the Corporation or its Subsidiaries.
(i) “Control Person” shall mean any person who, as of the date of grant of an Option, owns (within the meaning of Section 422A(b)(6) of the Code) stock possessing more than l0% of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Corporation or of any Parent or Subsidiary.
(j) “Corporation” shall mean Ultralife Corporation, a Delaware corporation.
(k) “Director” shall mean any member of the Board.
(1) “Disability” shall mean permanent and total disability as defined by Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.
(m) “Employee” shall mean any person employed by the Corporation or its Subsidiaries on a full or part-time basis, including Directors who are otherwise employed by the Corporation or its Subsidiaries.
(n) “Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as it may be amended from time to time, including the rules thereunder and any successor provisions and the rules thereto.
(o) “Fair Market Value” shall mean for any day (i) if the Corporation is a registrant under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Stock in the over-the-counter market, as determined in accordance with the trading rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System or, if the Stock is listed or admitted to trading on any national securities exchange, the VWAP as determined in accordance with the trading rules on such exchange or, (ii) if the Corporation is not a registrant under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, the price of the Stock will be determined by the Board on the date of grant but will not be less than the par value of such Stock.
(p) “Grantee” shall mean an Employee, Director or Consultant granted an Award under the Plan.
(q) “Immediate Family Member” shall mean the transferor and his or her spouse, children or grandchildren, whether natural, step or adopted children or grandchildren.
(r) “ISO” shall mean an Option granted pursuant to the Plan to purchase shares of Stock and intended to qualify as an incentive stock option under Section 422 of the Code, as now or hereafter constituted.
(s) “NQSO” shall mean an Option granted pursuant to the Plan to purchase shares of the Stock that is not an ISO.
(t) “Non-Employee Director” shall mean a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule l6b-3 under the Exchange Act.
(u) “Options” shall refer collectively to NQSOs and ISOs subject to the Plan.
(v) “Parent” shall mean any parent (as defined in Section 425 of the Code) of the Corporation.
(w) “Plan” shall mean the Ultralife Corporation 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan as set forth herein and as amended from time to time.
(x) “SAR” shall mean a stock appreciation right granted pursuant to Section 8 hereof; a stock appreciation right shall entitle the Grantee to receive a payment equal to the appreciation in a stated number of shares of Stock from the exercise price for that stock appreciation right to the Fair Market Value of the stated number of shares of Stock on the date of exercise.
(y) “Securities Act” shall mean the Securities Act of 1933 as it may be amended from time to time, including the rules thereunder and any successor provisions and the rules thereto.
(z) “Stock” shall mean shares of the Common Stock, par value $.10 per share, of the Corporation.
(aa) “Stock Award” shall mean an award of shares of Stock or restricted shares of Stock granted pursuant to Section 9 hereof.
(bb) “Subsidiary” shall mean any subsidiary (as defined in Section 425 of the Code) of the Corporation. Section 3. Shares of Stock Subject to the Plan. (a) In General. The maximum number of shares of Stock which shall be available for the grant or issuance of Awards under the Plan (including ISOs) during its term shall be equal to 1,750,000, which shares shall also be available for the grant or issuance of Awards under the Plan); provided, however, that no more than 800,000 shares of Stock may be used for Awards other than Options or SARs. Such amounts shall be subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(c) hereof. Any shares of Stock related to Awards which terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise without the issuance of such shares, are settled in cash in lieu of Stock, or are exchanged with the Committee’s permission for Awards not involving Stock, shall be available again for grant under the Plan. Moreover, if the exercise price of any Award granted under the Plan or the tax withholding requirements with respect to any Award granted under the Plan are satisfied by tendering shares of Stock to the Corporation (by either actual delivery or by attestation), only the number of shares of Stock issued net of the shares of Stock tendered will be deemed delivered for purposes of determining the maximum number of shares of Stock available for delivery under the Plan. The shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares, including shares purchased in open market or private transactions. For the purpose of computing the total number of shares of Stock granted under the Plan, where one or more types of Awards, both of which are payable in shares of Stock, are granted in tandem with each other, such that the exercise of one type of Award with respect to a number of shares cancels an equal number of shares of the other, the number of shares granted under both Awards shall be deemed to be equivalent to the number of shares under one of the Awards.
(b) Maximum Awards Payable. Subject to Section 3(c) hereof, and notwithstanding any provision contained in the Plan to the contrary, the maximum Award payable (or granted, if applicable) to any one Grantee under the Plan for a calendar year shall be 150,000 shares of Stock; provided, however, that the 150,000 share limitation shall not apply to inducement grants to Grantees who are new executives or key employees that do not exceed 700,000 shares of Stock.
(c) Adjustment Upon Changes in Capitalization. In the event of any reclassification, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, reorganization, issuance of warrants, rights or debentures, stock dividend, stock split or reverse stock split, cash dividend, property dividend, combination or exchange of shares, repurchase of shares or any other change in corporate structure which in the judgment of the Committee materially affects the value of shares, then the Committee may determine the substitutions or adjustments to the maximum number of shares available for the grant or issuance of Awards under the Plan pursuant to Section 3(a) hereof, the maximum Award payable under Section 3(b) hereof, the number and class of shares and the exercise price per share set forth in any Award theretofore granted, or any other affected terms of an Award or the Plan as the Committee, in its sole discretion and without liability to any person, deems equitable or appropriate; provided, however, that no such adjustments shall be made to any ISO without the Grantee’s consent, if such adjustment would cause such ISO to fail to qualify as such. Section 4. Administration of the Plan. (a) In General. The Committee shall have total and exclusive responsibility to control, operate, manage and administer the Plan in accordance with its terms. The Committee may act only by a majority of its members. Any determination of the Committee may be made, without a meeting, by a writing or writings signed by all of the members of the Committee. The decisions of the Committee and its actions with respect to the Plan shall be final, binding and conclusive upon all persons having or claiming to have any right or interest in or under the Plan. (b) Authority. The Committee shall have all the authority that may be necessary or helpful to enable it to discharge its responsibilities with respect to the Plan. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, the Committee shall have the exclusive right to: (i) determine eligibility for participation in the Plan; (ii) select the Grantees and determine the type of Awards to be made to Grantees, the number of shares of Stock subject to Awards and the terms, conditions, restrictions and limitations of the Awards, including, but not by way of limitation, restrictions on the transferability of Awards and conditions with respect to continued employment or performance criteria;
(iii) interpret the Plan or any Award Agreement;
(iv) construe any ambiguous provision, correct any default, supply any omission, and reconcile any inconsistency of the Plan or an Award Agreement;
(v) issue administrative guidelines as an aid to administer the Plan and make changes in such guidelines as it from time to time deems proper;
(vi) promulgate regulations for carrying out the Plan and make changes in such regulations as it from time to time deems proper;
(vii) to the extent permitted under the Plan, grant waivers of Plan terms, conditions, restrictions, and limitations;
(viii) promulgate rules and regulations regarding treatment of Awards of a Grantee under the Plan in the event of such Grantee’s death, disability, retirement, termination from the Corporation or breach of agreement by the Grantee, or in the event of a Change in Control of the Corporation;
(ix) to the extent permitted under the Plan, accelerate the vesting, exercise, or payment of an Award when such action or actions would be in the best interest of the Corporation;
(x) subject to Section 4(d) hereof, grant Awards in replacement of Awards previously granted under the Plan or any other executive compensation plan of the Corporation;
(xi) determine the terms and provisions of any Award Agreements entered into hereunder, including, a provision in an Award Agreement that requires, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control specified in Section 2(e)(iii) hereof, the cancellation for cash of outstanding Awards or the issuance of comparable replacement Awards granted by the successor entity in such event;
(xii) take any and all other action it deems necessary or advisable for the proper operation or administration of the Plan; and
(xiii) make all other determinations it deems necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan, including factual determinations. (c) Delegation. The Committee may allocate all or any portion of its responsibilities and powers under the Plan to any one or more of its members, the CEO or other senior members of management as the Committee deems appropriate and may delegate all or any part of its responsibilities and powers to any such person or persons, provided that any such allocation or delegation be in writing; provided, however, that only the Committee, or other committee consisting of two or more Non-Employee Directors may select and grant Awards to Grantees who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The Committee may revoke any such allocation or delegation at any time for any reason with or without prior notice. (d) Repricing. Except for adjustments pursuant to Section 3(c) hereof, the Committee shall not reprice any Options or SARs unless such action is approved by the stockholders of the Corporation. For purposes of the Plan, the term “reprice” shall mean: (i) the reduction, directly or indirectly, in the per-share exercise price of an outstanding Option or SAR by amendment, cancellation or substitution; (ii) any action that is treated as a repricing under United States generally accepted accounting principles; (iii) canceling an Option or SAR when its exercise price exceeds the fair market value of the underlying Stock in exchange for another Option, SAR or other equity security (unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with a merger, acquisition, or similar transaction); and (iv) any other action that is treated as a repricing by the rules or regulations of any stock exchange on which the securities of the Corporation are traded. Any amendment or repeal of this provision shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of shares of voting capital stock present at a stockholders meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon. Section 5. Awards.
(a) Eligibility. Subject to Section 4 hereof, all Employees, Directors and Consultants are eligible to participate in the Plan; provided, however, only Employees are eligible to receive ISOs. The Committee shall determine and designate from time to time those Employees, Directors and Consultants who are to be granted Awards, the nature of each Award granted and the number of shares of Stock subject to each such Award.
(b) In General. Awards may, at the Committee’s sole discretion, be paid in the form of Options pursuant to Section 6 hereof, SARs pursuant to Section 7 hereof, Stock Awards or Restricted Stock Units pursuant to Section 8 hereof, or a combination thereof. Each Award shall be subject to the terms, conditions, restrictions and limitations of the Plan and the Award Agreement for such Award. Awards under a particular Section of the Plan need not be uniform and Awards under two or more Sections may be combined into a single Award Agreement. Any combination of Awards may be granted at one time and on more than one occasion to the same Grantee.
(c) Foreign Jurisdictions. With respect to Grantees who reside or work outside of the United States, the Committee may, in its sole and absolute discretion, amend the terms of the Plan or Awards with respect to such Grantees in order to conform such terms with the provisions of local law and practice or otherwise as deemed necessary or desirable by the Committee.
Section 6. Stock Options.
(a) In General. Awards may be granted in the form of Options. Options granted under the Plan may be of two types: ISOs and NQSOs. The Committee shall have the authority and discretion to grant to an eligible Employee either ISOs, NQSOs, or both, but shall clearly designate the nature of each Option at the time of grant. Consultants and Directors shall only receive NQSOs.
(b) Terms of Options. An Option shall be exercisable in accordance with such terms and conditions and at such times and during such periods as may be determined by the Committee. In addition to any such terms and conditions, the following terms and conditions shall apply to all Options granted under the Plan: (i) The exercise price per share of Stock subject to an Option shall be not less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of the Stock on the date such Option is granted, except for Options granted in assumption of or substitution for outstanding awards previously granted by the Corporation or its affiliates or an entity that the Corporation acquires or with which the Corporation combines, in any case in a transaction contemplated by Section 3(c); provided, however, that the exercise price for any ISO granted to a Control Person shall not be less than 110% of such Fair Market Value.
(ii) The term of each Option shall be determined by the Committee, provided that no Option shall be exercisable more than ten years from the date such Option is granted, and provided further that no ISO granted to a Control Person shall be exercisable more than five years from the date of Option grant.
(iii) Notwithstanding any other provisions hereof, the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the time the ISO is granted) of the Stock with respect to which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by any Employee during any calendar year under all plans of the Corporation and any Parent or Subsidiary corporation shall not exceed $100,000. In the event that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the time of grant of an ISO) of the Stock with respect to which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by an Employee for any calendar year under all plans of the corporation and any Parent or Subsidiary corporation exceeds $100,000.00, then to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Stock with respect to ISOs exercisable for the first time by an Employee in such a calendar year exceeds $100,000.00, the ISOs providing for the purchase of such Stock shall automatically be converted into and shall be deemed to be NQSOs. (c) Exercise of Options. Except as provided in Section 10 hereof, no Option granted to an Employee or Consultant shall be exercised unless at the time of such exercise the Grantee is then an Employee or Consultant. Upon exercise, the exercise price of an Option may be paid in cash, or, to the extent permitted by the Committee, by tendering, by either actual delivery of shares or by attestation, shares of Stock, a combination of the foregoing, or such other consideration as the Committee may deem appropriate. The Committee shall establish appropriate methods for accepting Stock, whether restricted or unrestricted, and may impose such conditions as it deems appropriate on the use of such Stock to exercise an Option. Options awarded under the Plan may also be exercised by way of a broker-assisted stock option exercise program, if any, provided such program is available at the time of the Grantee’s exercise. Notwithstanding the foregoing or the provision of any Award Agreement, a Grantee may not pay the exercise price of an Option using shares of Stock if, in the opinion of counsel to the Corporation, (i) the Grantee is, or within the six months preceding such exercise was, subject to reporting under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, (ii) there is a substantial likelihood that the use of such form of payment or the timing of such form of payment would subject the Grantee to a substantial risk of liability under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, or (iii) there is a substantial likelihood that the use of such form of payment would result in accounting treatment to the Corporation under generally accepted accounting principles that the Committee reasonably determines is adverse to the Corporation. Section 7. Stock Appreciation Rights.
(a) In General. Awards may be granted in the form of SARs. SARs granted under the Plan may be of two types: an SAR granted in tandem with all or a portion of a related Option under the Plan (“Tandem SARs”) or granted separately (“Freestanding SARs”). A Tandem SAR may be granted either at the time of the grant of the related Option or at any time thereafter during the term of the Option.
(b) Tandem SARs. A Tandem SAR shall be exercisable to the extent, and only to the extent, that the related Option is exercisable, and the “exercise price” of such a SAR (the base from which the value of the SAR is measured at its exercise) shall be the exercise price under the related Option. However, at no time shall a Tandem SAR be issued if the exercise price of its related Option is less than the Fair Market Value of the Stock, as determined by the Committee, on the date that the Tandem SAR is granted. If a related Option is exercised as to some or all of the shares covered by the Award, the related Tandem SAR, if any, shall be canceled automatically to the extent of the number of shares covered by the Option exercise. Upon exercise of a Tandem SAR as to some or all of the shares covered by the Award, the related Option shall be canceled automatically to the extent of the number of shares covered by such exercise. All Tandem SARs shall expire not later than ten years from the date of the grant of the SAR.
(c) Freestanding SARs. Freestanding SARs shall be exercisable or automatically mature in accordance with such terms and conditions and at such times and during such periods as may be determined by the Committee. The exercise price of a Freestanding SAR shall be defined in the Award Agreement for that SAR and shall be not less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of the grant of the Freestanding SAR. All Freestanding SARs shall expire not later than ten years from the date of grant of the SAR.
(d) Exercise of SARs. Except as provided in Section 10 hereof, no SAR granted to an Employee or Consultant shall be exercised unless at the time of such exercise the Grantee is then an Employee or Consultant. The Committee may provide that an SAR shall be deemed to be exercised at the close of business on the scheduled expiration date of such SAR if at such time the SAR by its terms remains exercisable and, if so exercised, would result in a payment to the holder of such SAR. Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, an SAR may be paid in cash, shares of Stock or any combination thereof, as determined by the Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, at the time that the SAR is exercised.
| | | | | | | | | | (continuedSection 8. Stock Awards and to be signed on the reverse side)Restricted Stock Units. | | | | | | |
(a) In General. Awards may be granted in the form of Stock Awards or Restricted Stock Units. Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units shall be awarded in such numbers and at such times during the term of the Plan as the Committee shall determine. “Restricted Stock Unit” means an Award that is valued by reference to Stock, which value may be paid to the Grantee by delivery of such property as the Committee shall determine, including, without limitation, cash or Stock, or any combination thereof, and that has such restrictions as the Committee, in its sole discretion, may impose.
(b) Restrictions. The Committee may condition, restrict or limit the grant of a Stock Award or Restricted Stock Units on the achievement of enumerated performance objectives or, with respect to Stock Awards or Restricted Stock Units issued to an Employee or a Consultant, on such Employee’s or Consultant’s continued employment or service to the Corporation through a specified period of time. The restricted period specified in respect of any Stock Award or Restricted Stock Unit shall not be less than three years, except that the Committee may (i) provide for the restricted period to terminate at any time after one year upon the attainment of performance-based objectives, and (ii) grant Stock Awards or Restricted Stock Units of up to 30,000 shares of Stock without regard to this limitation. Furthermore, the Committee may not terminate the restrictions applicable to outstanding Stock Awards or Restricted Stock Units except in connection with a Change in Control. The Committee may grant an unrestricted Stock Award or Restricted Stock Units only if the Committee determines that such Stock Award is made in lieu of all or a portion of salary or cash bonus of comparable value.
(c) Rights of Holders of Restricted Stock. During the period in which any shares of Stock received pursuant to a Stock Award are subject to any restrictions, the Committee may, in its sole and absolute discretion, deny the Grantee to whom such shares have been awarded all or any of the rights of a stockholder with respect to such shares, including, but not by way of limitation, limiting the right to vote such shares or the right to receive dividends on such shares.
(d) Rights of Holders of Restricted Stock Units. A Grantee receiving an Award of Restricted Stock Units shall not possess voting rights, nor the right to receive cash dividends with respect to such Award, unless a right to Dividend Equivalents is included in the Award Agreement for such Award of Restricted Stock Units. If a right to Dividend Equivalents is included in the Award Agreement for an Award of Restricted Stock Units, then any Stock or any other property distributed as a dividend or otherwise with respect to the Stock underlying such Award as to which the restrictions have not yet lapsed shall be subject to the same restrictions as such Award of Restricted Stock Units, and may either be automatically deemed invested in additional Restricted Stock Units or held by the Company in escrow for the Grantee, and shall be paid to the Grantee at the same time as the Restricted Stock Units. “Dividend Equivalents” means an amount credited under a Grantee’s Restricted Stock Unit, which amount is equal to the dividends paid on the Stock, if any, determined as if the Restricted Stock Unit was shares of Stock on the record date of any such dividend.” Section 9. Payment of Awards. (a) In General. Absent a Plan or Award Agreement provision to the contrary, payment of Awards may, at the discretion of the Committee, be made in cash, Stock, a combination of cash and Stock, or any other form of property as the Committee shall determine. In addition, payment of Awards may include such terms, conditions, restrictions and/or limitations, if any, as the Committee deems appropriate, including, in the case of Awards paid in the form of Stock, restrictions on transfer and forfeiture provisions; provided, however, such terms, conditions, restrictions and/or limitations are not inconsistent with the Plan. (b) Withholding. The Corporation shall be entitled to deduct from any payment under the Plan, regardless of the form of such payment, the amount of all applicable income and employment taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such payment or may require the Grantee to pay to the Corporation such tax prior to and as a condition of the making of such payment. In accordance with any applicable administrative guidelines it establishes, the Committee may allow a Grantee to pay the amount of taxes required by law to be withheld from an Award by withholding from any payment of shares of Stock due as a result of such Award, or by permitting the Grantee to deliver to the Corporation, shares of Stock having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum amount of such required withholding taxes. Notwithstanding the foregoing or the provision of any Award Agreement, a Grantee may not pay the amount of taxes required by law to be withheld using shares of Stock if, in the opinion of counsel to the Corporation, (i) the Grantee is, or within the six months preceding such exercise was, subject to reporting under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, (ii) there is a substantial likelihood that the use of such form of payment or the timing of such form of payment would subject the Grantee to a substantial risk of liability under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, or (iii) there is a substantial likelihood that the use of such form of payment would result in accounting treatment to the Corporation under generally accepted accounting principles that the Committee reasonably determines is adverse to the Corporation.
Section 10. Effect of Termination of Relationship with the Corporation. (a) Committee Rules. The Committee shall have the authority to promulgate rules and regulations to determine the treatment of a Grantee’s Awards under the Plan in the event of such Grantee’s death, Disability, and termination. In addition, notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 10, the terms of an Award Agreement or the rules and regulations promulgated by the Committee and in effect from time to time, the Committee shall have the right to extend the period for exercise of any Option or SAR, provided such extension does not exceed the term of such Option or SAR.
(b) Death. Unless otherwise decided by the Committee and provided in an Award Agreement, upon a Grantee’s death prior to the complete exercise of the Options or SARs granted to him or her under the Plan, any remaining Options or SARs may be exercised in whole or in part within one year after the date of the Grantee’s death and then only: (i) by the beneficiary designated by the Grantee in a writing submitted to the Corporation prior to the Grantee’s death, or in the absence of same, by the Grantee’s estate or by or on behalf of such person or persons to whom the Grantee’s rights pass under his or her will or the laws of descent and distribution, (ii) to the extent that the Grantee would have been entitled to exercise the Option or SAR at the date of his or her death and subject to all of the conditions on exercise imposed by the Plan and the Award Agreement, and (iii) prior to the expiration of the term of the Option or SAR. (c) Disability. Unless otherwise decided by the Committee and provided in an Award Agreement, upon a Grantee’s Disability prior to the complete exercise of the Options or SARs granted to him or her under the Plan, any remaining Options or SARs may be exercised in whole or in part within one year after the date of the Grantee’s Disability and then only: (i) by the Grantee or his or her legal representative, (ii) to the extent that the Grantee would have been entitled to exercise the Option or SAR on the date of his or her Disability, subject to all of the conditions on exercise imposed by the Plan and the Award Agreement, and (iii) prior to the expiration of the term of the Option or SAR.
(d) Other Termination. Unless otherwise decided by the Committee and provided in an Award Agreement, the termination of a Grantee’s employment, consulting relationship or term of directorship with the Corporation for a reason other than the Grantee’s death or Disability and prior to the complete exercise of the Options or SARs granted to him or her under the Plan, any remaining Options or SARs may be exercised in whole or in part within three months after the date of the Grantee’s termination and then only:
(i) by the Grantee or his or her legal representative, (ii) to the extent that the Grantee would have been entitled to exercise the Option or SAR on the date of his or her termination, subject to all of the conditions on exercise imposed by the Plan and the Award Agreement, and (iii) prior to the expiration of the term of the Option or SAR.
(e) Treatment of Intra-Corporation Transfers. In the case of an Employee or Consultant, the transfer between the Corporation and any Subsidiary shall not be deemed to be a termination of employment or consulting relationship, and a change from the status of an Employee to a Consultant or from a Consultant to an Employee shall not be deemed to be a termination of employment or consulting relationship.
Section 11. General Provisions.
(a) Award Agreement. Each Award grant shall be evidenced by a written Award Agreement containing such terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the Plan, as the Committee shall approve. The terms and provisions of Award Agreements may vary among Grantees and among different Awards granted to the same Grantee. Any Stock Award granted under the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Committee deems appropriate, including, without limitation, book-entry registration or issuance of a stock certificate or certificates, with such restrictive legends and/or stop transfer instructions as the Committee deems appropriate. (b) No Right to Further Awards or Continued Service. The grant of an Award in any year shall not give the Grantee any right to similar grants in future years or any right to continue such Grantee’s employment or consultant relationship with the Corporation or its Subsidiaries. All Grantees shall remain subject to discharge to the same extent as if the Plan were not in effect. (c) No Right, Title, or Interest in Corporation Assets. No Grantee shall have any rights as a stockholder as a result of participation in the Plan until the date of issuance of a stock certificate in his or her name, and, in the case of restricted shares of Stock, such rights are granted to the Grantee under the Plan. To the extent any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Corporation under the Plan, such rights shall be no greater than the rights of an unsecured creditor of the Corporation and the Grantee shall not have any rights in or against any specific assets of the Corporation. All of the Awards granted under the Plan shall be unfunded and the Corporation shall not be required to establish any fund or make any other segregation of assets to assure the payment of any Award. (d) Nonassignability. (i) Except as otherwise determined by the Committee or as otherwise provided in Section 11(d)(ii) hereof, no Award or other right under the Plan shall be subject to anticipation, sale, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, or charge except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and an Award shall be exercisable during the Grantee’s lifetime only by the Grantee. (ii) The Committee shall have the discretionary authority to grant NQSOs or amend outstanding NQSOs to provide that they be transferable, subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee shall establish. In addition to any such terms and conditions, the following terms and conditions shall apply to all transfers of NQSOs:
(A) Except as otherwise permitted by the Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, only Directors and corporate officers of the Corporation shall be permitted to transfer their NQSOs, and such individuals must be a Director or a corporate officer on the date of transfer.
(B) Transfers shall only be permitted to: (1) the transferor’s Immediate Family Members; (2) a trust or trusts for the exclusive benefit of the transferor’s Immediate Family Members; or (3) a family partnership or family limited partnership in which each partner is, at the time of transfer and all time subsequent thereto, either an Immediate Family Member or a trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more Immediate Family Members.
(C) All transfers shall be made for no consideration.
(D) Once a NQSO is transferred, any subsequent transfer of such transferred NQSO shall, notwithstanding Section 11(d)(i) hereof to the contrary, be permitted; provided, however, such subsequent transfer complies with all of the terms and conditions of this Section 11(d)(ii), with the exception of Section 11(d)(ii)(A) hereof.
(E) In order for a transfer to be effective, the Committee’s designated transfer agent must be used to effectuate the transfer. The costs of such transfer agent shall be borne solely by the transferor.
(F) In order for a transfer in accordance with Section 11(d)(ii) to be effective, the transferor must agree in writing prior to the transfer on a form provided by the Corporation to pay any and all payroll and withholding taxes due upon exercise of the transferred NQSO. In addition, prior to the exercise of the transferred NQSO by the transferee, arrangements must be made by the Grantee with the Corporation for the payment of any and all payroll and withholding taxes.
(G) Upon transfer, a NQSO continues to be governed by and subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan. A transferee of a NQSO is entitled to the same rights as the Grantee to whom such NQSO was originally granted, as if no transfer had taken place. Accordingly, the rights of the transferee are subject to the terms and conditions of the original grant of the NQSO, including provisions relating to expiration date, exercisability, exercise price and forfeiture.
(H) The Corporation shall be under no obligation to provide a transferee with any notice regarding the transferred NQSO held by the transferee upon forfeiture or any other circumstance.
(e) Regulatory Approvals and Listings. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or Award Agreements made pursuant thereto, the Corporation shall not be required to issue or deliver any certificate or certificates for shares of Stock under the Plan prior to fulfillment of all of the following conditions:
(i) The listing, or approval for listing upon notice of issuance, of such shares on any securities exchange on which the Stock may then be traded;
(ii) Any registration or other qualification of such shares under any state or federal law or regulation, or other qualification which the Board shall, in its absolute discretion and upon the advice of counsel, deem necessary or advisable;
(iii) The obtaining of any other consent approval or permit from any state or federal government agency which the Board shall, in its absolute discretion and upon the advice of counsel, determine to be necessary or advisable; and
(iv) The execution by the Grantee (or the Grantee’s legal representative) of such written representation that the Committee may in its sole discretion deem necessary or advisable to the effect that the shares then being purchased are being purchased for investment with no present intention of reselling or otherwise disposing of such shares in any manner which may result in a violation of the Securities Act and the placement upon certificates for such shares of an appropriate legend in connection therewith.
(f) In the case of a grant of an Option to any Employee or Consultant of a Subsidiary, the Corporation may, if the Committee so directs, issue or transfer the shares covered by the Option to the Subsidiary, for such lawful consideration as the Committee may specify, upon the condition or understanding that the Subsidiary will transfer the shares to the Employee or Consultant in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the Award Agreement relating to such Option.
(g) Governing Law. The Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, except as superseded by applicable federal law, without giving effect to its conflicts of law provisions.
(h) No Guarantee of Tax Consequences. No person connected with the Plan in any capacity, including, but not limited to, the Corporation and its directors, officers, agents and employees, makes any representation, commitment, or guarantee that any tax treatment, including, but not limited to, federal, state and local income, estate and gift tax treatment, will be applicable with respect to the tax treatment of any Award, or that such tax treatment will apply to or be available to a Grantee on account of participation in the Plan.
(i) Amendment or Termination. The Board may, at any time and for any reason, with or without prior notice, suspend, discontinue or terminate the Plan; provided, however, that no such action shall adversely affect the rights of Grantees to Awards previously granted hereunder. In addition, the Board may, at any time and for any reason, with or without prior notice, amend the Plan in any manner, but may not without stockholder approval, adopt any amendment which would: (i) increase the number of shares available under the Plan; (ii) expand the types of Awards available under the Plan; (iii) expand the class of persons eligible to participate in the Plan; (iv) extend the term of the Plan; (v) be a material amendment to the Plan, including, but not limited to, a change in the method of determining the exercise price of Options issued under the Plan; (vi) allow for repricing of Options or SARs issued under the Plan; (vii) terminate restrictions applicable to Awards (except in connection with a Grantee’s death, Disability or termination of employment or in connection with a Change in Control); or (viii) require the vote of the stockholders if such approval is necessary or desirable in order to comply with tax, securities, or other applicable laws or regulations, including, but not limited to, the listing requirements of the stock exchanges on which the securities of Corporation are listed.
(j) Effective Date and Duration of Plan. The adoption of the Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on March 27, 2014, subject, however, to approval by the stockholders of the Corporation by a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the 2014 annual meeting of the Corporation’s stockholders including any adjournment thereof. The effective date of the Plan shall be the date of such approval by the Corporation’s stockholders. Awards may not be granted under the Plan after June 2, 2024, but Awards theretofore granted may extend beyond that date.   |
|
